Display options
Share it on

JMIR Ment Health. 2017 Oct 31;4(4):e51. doi: 10.2196/mental.7704.

Assessing Therapist Competence: Development of a Performance-Based Measure and Its Comparison With a Web-Based Measure.

JMIR mental health

Zafra Cooper, Helen Doll, Suzanne Bailey-Straebler, Kristin Bohn, Dian de Vries, Rebecca Murphy, Marianne E O'Connor, Christopher G Fairburn

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
  3. Icon Patient Reported Outcomes, Oxford, United Kingdom.

PMID: 29089289 PMCID: PMC5686418 DOI: 10.2196/mental.7704

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent research interest in how best to train therapists to deliver psychological treatments has highlighted the need for rigorous, but scalable, means of measuring therapist competence. There are at least two components involved in assessing therapist competence: the assessment of their knowledge of the treatment concerned, including how and when to use its strategies and procedures, and an evaluation of their ability to apply such knowledge skillfully in practice. While the assessment of therapists' knowledge has the potential to be completed efficiently on the Web, the assessment of skill has generally involved a labor-intensive process carried out by clinicians, and as such, may not be suitable for assessing training outcome in certain circumstances.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to develop and evaluate a role-play-based measure of skill suitable for assessing training outcome and to compare its performance with a highly scalable Web-based measure of applied knowledge.

METHODS: Using enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for eating disorders as an exemplar, clinical scenarios for role-play assessment were developed and piloted together with a rating scheme for assessing trainee therapists' performance. These scenarios were evaluated by examining the performance of 93 therapists from different professional backgrounds and at different levels of training in implementing CBT-E. These therapists also completed a previously developed Web-based measure of applied knowledge, and the ability of the Web-based measure to efficiently predict competence on the role-play measure was investigated.

RESULTS: The role-play measure assessed performance at implementing a range of CBT-E procedures. The majority of the therapists rated their performance as moderately or closely resembling their usual clinical performance. Trained raters were able to achieve good-to-excellent reliability for averaged competence, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from .653 to 909. The measure was also sensitive to change, with scores being significantly higher after training than before as might be expected (mean difference 0.758, P<.001) even when taking account of repeated data (mean difference 0.667, P<.001). The major shortcoming of the role-play measure was that it required considerable time and resources. This shortcoming is inherent in the method. Given this, of most interest for assessing training outcome, scores on the Web-based measure efficiently predicted therapist competence, as judged by the role-play measure (with the Web-based measure having a positive predictive value of 77% and specificity of 78%).

CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that while it was feasible and acceptable to assess performance using the newly developed role-play measure, the highly scalable Web-based measure could be used in certain circumstances as a substitute for the more labor-intensive, and hence, more costly role-play method.

©Zafra Cooper, Helen Doll, Suzanne Bailey-Straebler, Kristin Bohn, Dian de Vries, Rebecca Murphy, Marianne E O'Connor, Christopher G Fairburn. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 31.10.2017.

Keywords: Web-based knowledge assessment; cognitive-behavioral treatment; eating disorders; scalable assessment; skill assessment; therapist competence; therapist training outcome

References

  1. Med Teach. 2003 Jul;25(4):414-21 - PubMed
  2. Am Psychol. 2010 Feb-Mar;65(2):73-84 - PubMed
  3. Behav Res Ther. 2016 Feb;77:129-37 - PubMed
  4. Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):322-4 - PubMed
  5. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;33(3):484-99 - PubMed
  6. Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Jul;63(7):660-5 - PubMed
  7. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Sep;68:11-23 - PubMed
  8. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Dec;50(12):747-52 - PubMed
  9. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun 27;:null - PubMed
  10. Clin Psychol (New York). 2010 Mar;17(1):1-30 - PubMed
  11. Acad Med. 1999 Oct;74(10):1129-34 - PubMed
  12. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Jun;49(6-7):373-8 - PubMed
  13. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jul;70:64-71 - PubMed
  14. J Trauma Stress. 2014 Dec;27(6):703-11 - PubMed
  15. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:37-48 - PubMed
  16. Psychother Res. 2018 Jan;28(1):3-17 - PubMed
  17. Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7 - PubMed
  18. Behav Ther. 2015 May;46(3):283-95 - PubMed
  19. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2012 Mar;40(2):149-61 - PubMed
  20. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):323 - PubMed
  21. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Jan;64:43-8 - PubMed
  22. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;166(3):311-9 - PubMed
  23. Behav Res Ther. 2003 May;41(5):509-28 - PubMed
  24. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed
  25. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jul 1;96(1-2):37-48 - PubMed
  26. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2005;10(1):1-3 - PubMed
  27. Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;38(1):26-34 - PubMed
  28. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6):703-19 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support