Display options
Share it on

Surg Res Pract. 2017;2017:1017584. doi: 10.1155/2017/1017584. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

A Single Centre Experience of Day Case Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Outcomes by Body Mass Index Group.

Surgery research and practice

Kirk Bowling, Samantha Leong, Sarah El-Badawy, Erfan Massri, Jaideep Rait, Jay Atkinson, Gandrapu Srinivas, Stuart Andrews

Affiliations

  1. Peninsula Deanery, Torbay Hospital, South Devon Healthcare Trust, Lawes Bridge, Torquay TQ2 7AA, UK.
  2. Peninsula Deanery, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Healthcare Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK.

PMID: 29094063 PMCID: PMC5637831 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1017584

Abstract

AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether patients with a high BMI can undergo safe day case LC for cholecystitis compared to groups of patients with a lower BMI.

SETTING: NHS District General Hospital, UK.

METHODS: A retrospective review of 2391 patients who underwent an attempted day case LC between 1 January 2009 and 15 August 2015 was performed. Patients were divided into five groups depending on their BMI. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing elective day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholecystitis on histology. The endpoints were complication requiring readmission and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS: There were 2391 LCs performed in the time period of which 1646 were eligible for inclusion. These LCs were classified as 273 (16.9%), 608 (37.8%), 428 (26.6%), 208 (12.9%), and 91 (5.66%) patients in the groups with BMI values of 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, 35-39.9, and >40, respectively. Average BMI was 30.0 (±5.53, 19-51) with an average postoperative LOS of 0.86, and there was no difference between the BMI groups. Overall complication rate was 4.3%; there was no significance between BMI groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Increased BMI was not associated with worse outcomes after day case LC.

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD006231 - PubMed
  2. Arch Surg. 2005 Oct;140(10):986-92 - PubMed
  3. Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):699-707 - PubMed
  4. Ann Surg. 1999 Apr;229(4):449-57 - PubMed
  5. BMC Surg. 2015 Aug 13;15:97 - PubMed
  6. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Oct;219(4):718-24 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):815-25 - PubMed

Publication Types