Display options
Cite
Yates MC, Bernos TA, Fraser DJ. A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes. Evol Appl. 2017;10(9):935-945doi: 10.1111/eva.12496.
Yates, M. C., Bernos, T. A., & Fraser, D. J. (2017). A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes. Evolutionary applications, 10(9), 935-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12496
Yates, Matthew Carl, et al. "A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes." Evolutionary applications vol. 10,9 (2017): 935-945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12496
Yates MC, Bernos TA, Fraser DJ. A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes. Evol Appl. 2017 Jul 04;10(9):935-945. doi: 10.1111/eva.12496. eCollection 2017 Oct. PMID: 29151884; PMCID: PMC5680432.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Evol Appl. 2017 Jul 04;10(9):935-945. doi: 10.1111/eva.12496. eCollection 2017 Oct.

A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes.

Evolutionary applications

Matthew Carl Yates, Thais A Bernos, Dylan J Fraser

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology Concordia University Montreal QC Canada.
  2. Group for Interuniversity Research in Limnology and Aquatic Environments (GRIL) Universite du Quebec Trois-Rivieres QC Canada.

PMID: 29151884 PMCID: PMC5680432 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12496

Abstract

Technological and methodological advances have facilitated the use of genetic data to infer census population size (N

Keywords: conservation biology; conservation genetics; effective population size; fisheries management; inventory and monitoring; wildlife management

References

  1. Naturwissenschaften. 2016 Jun;103(5-6):47 - PubMed
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 29;360(1459):1395-409 - PubMed
  3. Mol Ecol. 2008 Aug;17(15):3428-47 - PubMed
  4. Mol Ecol. 2016 Oct;25(19):4692-711 - PubMed
  5. Oecologia. 1988 Mar;75(2):169-174 - PubMed
  6. Ecol Evol. 2012 Mar;2(3):562-73 - PubMed
  7. Genetics. 2009 Aug;182(4):1233-49 - PubMed
  8. Mol Ecol. 2003 Sep;12(9):2417-28 - PubMed
  9. Environ Manage. 1998 Sep;22(5):655-69 - PubMed
  10. Mol Ecol. 2009 Dec;18(23):4790-7 - PubMed
  11. Heredity (Edinb). 2001 Jun;86(Pt 6):675-84 - PubMed
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Aug 07;280(1768):20131339 - PubMed
  13. Ecol Evol. 2013 Dec;3(15):4954-69 - PubMed
  14. Evolution. 2015 Aug;69(8):2154-66 - PubMed
  15. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jul;8(4):753-6 - PubMed
  16. J Fish Biol. 2016 Dec;89(6):2505-2518 - PubMed
  17. Evolution. 2014 Jun;68(6):1722-34 - PubMed
  18. Ecol Evol. 2012 Sep;2(9):2357-65 - PubMed
  19. Mol Ecol. 2015 Jul;24(14):3585-602 - PubMed
  20. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Jul;10(4):684-92 - PubMed
  21. Evol Appl. 2017 Jul 04;10(9):935-945 - PubMed
  22. Evol Appl. 2014 Nov;7(9):1094-106 - PubMed
  23. Evol Appl. 2016 Apr 03;9(5):640-57 - PubMed
  24. Ecol Evol. 2013 Mar;3(3):569-80 - PubMed
  25. Mol Ecol. 2013 May;22(9):2394-407 - PubMed
  26. Mol Ecol. 2016 Oct;25(19):4689-91 - PubMed
  27. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 27;283(1823): - PubMed
  28. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48464 - PubMed
  29. Mol Ecol. 2010 Jul;19(14):2832-44 - PubMed
  30. Mol Ecol. 2012 Mar;21(6):1394-410 - PubMed
  31. Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Oct;117(4):268-78 - PubMed
  32. Evol Appl. 2010 May;3(3):244-62 - PubMed
  33. Mol Ecol. 2016 Sep;25(18):4472-87 - PubMed
  34. Mol Ecol. 2004 Jan;13(1):67-80 - PubMed

Publication Types