Display options
Cite
Sato M, Honda K, Uy WH, et al. Marine protected area restricts demographic connectivity: Dissimilarity in a marine environment can function as a biological barrier. Ecol Evol. 2017;7(19):7859-7871doi: 10.1002/ece3.3318.
Sato, M., Honda, K., Uy, W. H., Baslot, D. I., Genovia, T. G., Nakamura, Y., Bernardo, L. P. C., Kurokochi, H., Pantallano, A. D. S., Lian, C., Nadaoka, K., & Nakaoka, M. (2017). Marine protected area restricts demographic connectivity: Dissimilarity in a marine environment can function as a biological barrier. Ecology and evolution, 7(19), 7859-7871. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3318
Sato, Masaaki, et al. "Marine protected area restricts demographic connectivity: Dissimilarity in a marine environment can function as a biological barrier." Ecology and evolution vol. 7,19 (2017): 7859-7871. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3318
Sato M, Honda K, Uy WH, Baslot DI, Genovia TG, Nakamura Y, Bernardo LPC, Kurokochi H, Pantallano ADS, Lian C, Nadaoka K, Nakaoka M. Marine protected area restricts demographic connectivity: Dissimilarity in a marine environment can function as a biological barrier. Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug 29;7(19):7859-7871. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3318. eCollection 2017 Oct. PMID: 29043040; PMCID: PMC5632639.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug 29;7(19):7859-7871. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3318. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Marine protected area restricts demographic connectivity: Dissimilarity in a marine environment can function as a biological barrier.

Ecology and evolution

Masaaki Sato, Kentaro Honda, Wilfredo H Uy, Darwin I Baslot, Tom G Genovia, Yohei Nakamura, Lawrence Patrick C Bernardo, Hiroyuki Kurokochi, Allyn Duvin S Pantallano, Chunlan Lian, Kazuo Nadaoka, Masahiro Nakaoka

Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Environmental Science Hokkaido University Akkeshi-cho Hokkaido Japan.
  2. Present address: National Research Institute of Fisheries Engineering Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency Hasaki Kamisu-shi Ibaraki Japan.
  3. Akkeshi Marine Station Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere Hokkaido University Akkeshi-cho Hokkaido Japan.
  4. Present address: Hokkaido National Fisheries Research Institute Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency Toyohira-ku Sapporo Hokkaido Japan.
  5. Institute of Fisheries Research and Development Mindanao State University at Naawan Naawan Misamis Oriental Philippines.
  6. Graduate School of Kuroshio Science Kochi University Nankoku Kochi Japan.
  7. Department of Mechanical and Environmental Informatics Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology Meguro Tokyo Japan.
  8. Asian Natural Environmental Science Center The University of Tokyo Nishitokyo Tokyo Japan.

PMID: 29043040 PMCID: PMC5632639 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3318

Abstract

The establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) can often lead to environmental differences between MPAs and fishing zones. To determine the effects on marine dispersal of environmental dissimilarity between an MPA and fishing zone, we examined the abundance and recruitment patterns of two anemonefishes (

Keywords: Philippines; coral reef fish; larval dispersal; microsatellites; parentage analysis

References

  1. J Morphol. 2010 Jun;271(6):682-96 - PubMed
  2. Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):216-20 - PubMed
  3. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2009;1:443-66 - PubMed
  4. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e65735 - PubMed
  5. Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):1314-8 - PubMed
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 22;275(1653):2831-9 - PubMed
  7. Ecol Evol. 2012 Feb;2(2):444-52 - PubMed
  8. Science. 2006 Jan 6;311(5757):98-101 - PubMed
  9. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 - PubMed
  10. Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Nov;93(5):504-9 - PubMed
  11. Mol Ecol. 2012 Oct;21(19):4695-705 - PubMed
  12. Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Jul;13(4):734-9 - PubMed
  13. Oecologia. 2003 May;135(4):532-41 - PubMed
  14. Mol Ecol. 2016 Jan;25(2):487-99 - PubMed
  15. Oecologia. 2002 Jun;132(1):131-142 - PubMed
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18256-61 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13606-11 - PubMed
  18. Ecology. 2014 May;95(5):1294-307 - PubMed
  19. Mol Ecol. 2014 Feb;23(2):453-63 - PubMed
  20. Curr Biol. 2015 Apr 20;25(8):983-92 - PubMed
  21. Curr Biol. 2012 Jun 5;22(11):1023-8 - PubMed
  22. Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug 29;7(19):7859-7871 - PubMed
  23. Ecol Lett. 2013 Feb;16(2):175-82 - PubMed
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 26;107(43):18278-85 - PubMed
  25. Ecol Lett. 2010 Jan;13(1):128-40 - PubMed
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Oct 7;278(1720):2954-61 - PubMed
  27. J Anim Ecol. 2011 May;80(3):528-38 - PubMed
  28. Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(5):1099-106 - PubMed
  29. Science. 2007 May 4;316(5825):742-4 - PubMed
  30. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):551-5 - PubMed
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 7;106(14):5693-7 - PubMed
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):1883-8 - PubMed
  33. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Feb;20(2):74-80 - PubMed
  34. Mol Ecol. 2014 Jun;23(12):2902-13 - PubMed
  35. Mol Ecol. 2013 Feb;22(4):1158-70 - PubMed
  36. Evolution. 2010 Sep;64(9):2688-700 - PubMed
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104(20):8362-7 - PubMed
  38. Mol Ecol. 2014 Dec;23(24):6029-44 - PubMed
  39. Ecol Appl. 2012 Jun;22(4):1257-67 - PubMed
  40. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 7;277(1688):1685-94 - PubMed
  41. Mol Ecol. 2013 May;22(9):2563-72 - PubMed
  42. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Oct;1355:31-51 - PubMed
  43. J Anim Ecol. 2012 Nov;81(6):1161-1170 - PubMed

Publication Types