Display options
Cite
Laskowski KL, Pearish S, Bensky M, et al. Predictors of Individual Variation in Movement in a Natural Population of Threespine Stickleback (. Adv Ecol Res. 2015;52:65-90doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.004.
Laskowski, K. L., Pearish, S., Bensky, M., & Bell, A. M. (2015). Predictors of Individual Variation in Movement in a Natural Population of Threespine Stickleback (. Advances in ecological research, 5265-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.004
Laskowski, Kate L, et al. "Predictors of Individual Variation in Movement in a Natural Population of Threespine Stickleback (." Advances in ecological research vol. 52 (2015): 65-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.004
Laskowski KL, Pearish S, Bensky M, Bell AM. Predictors of Individual Variation in Movement in a Natural Population of Threespine Stickleback (. Adv Ecol Res. 2015;52:65-90. doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Apr 22. PMID: 29046595; PMCID: PMC5642938.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Adv Ecol Res. 2015;52:65-90. doi: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Apr 22.

Predictors of Individual Variation in Movement in a Natural Population of Threespine Stickleback (.

Advances in ecological research

Kate L Laskowski, Simon Pearish, Miles Bensky, Alison M Bell

Affiliations

  1. School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, USA.

PMID: 29046595 PMCID: PMC5642938 DOI: 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.01.004

Abstract

Species abundances and distributions are inherently tied to individuals' decisions about movement within their habitat. Therefore, integrating individual phenotypic variation within a larger ecological framework may provide better insight into how populations structure themselves. Recent evidence for consistent individual differences in behaviour prompts the hypothesis that variation in behavioural types might be related to variation in movement in natural environments. In a multiyear mark-recapture study, we found that individual sticklebacks exhibited consistent individual differences in behaviour both within a standardized testing arena designed to measure exploratory behaviour and within a river. Therefore, we asked whether individual differences in movement in a natural river were related to an individual's exploratory behavioural type. We also considered whether body condition and/or the individual's habitat or social environment use was related to movement. There was no evidence that an individual's exploratory behavioural type was related to movement within the river. Instead, an individual's habitat use and body condition interacted to influence natural movement patterns. Individuals in good condition were more likely to move further in the river, but only if they inhabited a vegetated complex part of the river; body condition had no influence on movement in those individuals inhabiting open areas of the river. Our results suggest that individual traits could help improve predictions about how populations may distribute themselves within patchy and complex environments.

References

  1. J Fish Biol. 2014 Apr;84(4):1240-6 - PubMed
  2. J Anim Sci. 2010 Nov;88(11):3513-21 - PubMed
  3. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005 May;80(2):205-25 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 18;104(38):15017-22 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19;97(26):14825-30 - PubMed
  6. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1549-57 - PubMed
  7. Ecol Lett. 2007 Sep;10(9):828-34 - PubMed
  8. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 May;87(2):290-312 - PubMed
  9. Anim Behav. 2014 Apr 1;90:287-295 - PubMed
  10. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Apr;26(4):183-92 - PubMed
  11. Am Nat. 2001 Aug;158(2):124-35 - PubMed
  12. Evolution. 2011 Aug;65(8):2325-34 - PubMed
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):383-90 - PubMed
  14. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):101-8 - PubMed
  15. Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 May;29(5):245-7 - PubMed
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 22;276(1671):3369-75 - PubMed
  17. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Apr;27(4):244-52 - PubMed
  18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 13;110(33):13452-6 - PubMed
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Apr 7;270(1516):741-7 - PubMed
  20. Ecol Lett. 2011 Sep;14(9):871-6 - PubMed
  21. Anim Behav. 2009 Apr 1;77(4):771-783 - PubMed
  22. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):935-56 - PubMed
  23. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013 May 1;67(5):765-774 - PubMed
  24. Ecol Lett. 2012 Oct;15(10):1189-98 - PubMed
  25. Am Nat. 1992 Jul;140(1):85-108 - PubMed
  26. J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1128-38 - PubMed
  27. J Evol Biol. 2005 Mar;18(2):464-73 - PubMed
  28. Evolution. 2009 Aug;63(8):2004-16 - PubMed
  29. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1571-9 - PubMed
  30. Oecologia. 2009 Oct;161(4):837-47 - PubMed
  31. J Anim Ecol. 2014 Jan;83(1):214-22 - PubMed
  32. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Feb;24(2):66-7 - PubMed
  33. Anim Behav. 1998 Oct;56(4):927-936 - PubMed
  34. Ecol Lett. 2013 Jun;16(6):746-53 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support