Display options
Cite
Kiomarsi N, Espahbodi M, Chiniforush N, et al. In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive. Laser Ther. 2017;26(3):173-180doi: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12.
Kiomarsi, N., Espahbodi, M., Chiniforush, N., Karazifard, M. J., & Kamangar, S. S. H. (2017). In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive. Laser therapy, 26(3), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12
Kiomarsi, Nazanin, et al. "In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive." Laser therapy vol. 26,3 (2017): 173-180. doi: https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12
Kiomarsi N, Espahbodi M, Chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Kamangar SSH. In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive. Laser Ther. 2017 Sep 30;26(3):173-180. doi: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12. PMID: 29133964; PMCID: PMC5675907.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Laser Ther. 2017 Sep 30;26(3):173-180. doi: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12.

In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive.

Laser therapy

Nazanin Kiomarsi, Melika Espahbodi, Nasim Chiniforush, Mohammad Javd Karazifard, Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar

Affiliations

  1. Department of operative dentistry, Dental school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International campus, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Tehran University of Medical Science, International campus, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Laser Research Center of Dentistry (LRCD), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Department of epidemiology and biostatistics, Faculty of public health, Dental school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 29133964 PMCID: PMC5675907 DOI: 10.5978/islsm.17-OR-12

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effect of surface treatment by bur and laser and application of universal adhesive on repair bond strength of composite resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 composite blocks measuring 6×4×4 mm were fabricated of Filtek Z250 composite. All samples were subjected to 5,000 thermal cycles and divided into two groups for surface preparation by bur and by Er,Cr:YSGG laser (n = 60). The surfaces were then etched with orthophosphoric acid, rinsed with water and divided into three groups (silane, silane plus Single Bond and silane plus Single Bond Universal). Repair composite was then bonded to aged composite. Half of the samples in each group were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours and the other half underwent 5000 thermal cycles. All samples were then subjected to shear bond strength testing using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Mode of failure was determined using a stereomicroscope.

RESULTS: Bur preparation plus universal adhesive yielded the highest bond strength (30.16 µ 2.26 MPa). Laser plus silane yielded the lowest bond strength (5.63 µ 2.43 MPa). Bur preparation yielded significantly higher bond strength than laser (P < 0.001). Also, application of universal adhesive significantly improved bond strength compared to conventional adhesive and silane (P < 0.001). Bond strength after aging (5000 thermal cycles) had no significant difference with primary bond strength at 24 hours within each group (P = 0.182).

CONCLUSION: Surface preparation of aged composite by bur and application of universal adhesive can improve the repair bond strength of composite. Application of silane (without adhesive) in the process of repair cannot provide adequately high repair bond strength.

Keywords: Bur, Silane; Composite; Er,Cr,YSGG Laser; Surface treatment; Universal adhesive

References

  1. Lasers Med Sci. 2010 Jan;25(1):1-7 - PubMed
  2. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jul;27(4):723-8 - PubMed
  3. Scand J Dent Res. 1991 Apr;99(2):173-80 - PubMed
  4. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Feb;77(2):122-6 - PubMed
  5. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Oct;28 Suppl 2:S25-30 - PubMed
  6. Braz Oral Res. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):485-91 - PubMed
  7. Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):528-34 - PubMed
  8. Dent Mater. 2012 Aug;28(8):894-902 - PubMed
  9. J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):35-40 - PubMed
  10. Biomater Res. 2015 May 22;19:11 - PubMed
  11. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Oct;15(4):383-7 - PubMed
  12. Dent Mater. 2009 Apr;25(4):442-51 - PubMed
  13. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(2):132-9 - PubMed
  14. Clin Oral Investig. 2009 Sep;13(3):317-23 - PubMed
  15. J Dent. 2008 Dec;36(12):969-76 - PubMed
  16. J Adhes Dent. 2005 Summer;7(2):159-64 - PubMed
  17. Oper Dent. 1993 Sep-Oct;18(5):187-94 - PubMed
  18. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006 Apr;77(1):28-33 - PubMed
  19. Scand J Dent Res. 1986 Aug;94(4):364-9 - PubMed
  20. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Oct;23(5):324-35 - PubMed
  21. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(5):421-6 - PubMed
  22. J Adhes Dent. 2013 Oct;15(5):447-52 - PubMed
  23. J Adhes Dent. 2007 Feb;9(1):25-31 - PubMed
  24. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):213-20 - PubMed
  25. Int Dent J. 2000 Dec;50(6):361-6 - PubMed
  26. J Adv Res. 2016 Mar;7(2):263-9 - PubMed
  27. J Dent Res. 1982 Jun;61(6):791-5 - PubMed
  28. J Prosthet Dent. 1978 Jan;39(1):63-7 - PubMed
  29. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(4):251-60 - PubMed
  30. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;119(4):316-22 - PubMed
  31. J Conserv Dent. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):242-6 - PubMed
  32. J Dent. 2003 Nov;31(8):521-5 - PubMed
  33. Dent Mater. 2007 Apr;23 (4):519-25 - PubMed

Publication Types