Display options
Share it on

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Dec;12(7):1034-1047. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20171034.

SPINAL AND PERIPHERAL DRY NEEDLING VERSUS PERIPHERAL DRY NEEDLING ALONE AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH A HISTORY OF LATERAL ANKLE SPRAIN: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

International journal of sports physical therapy

Ainsley Rossi, Sara Blaustein, Joshua Brown, Kari Dieffenderfer, Elaine Ervin, Steven Griffin, Elizabeth Frierson, Kathleen Geist, Marie Johanson

Affiliations

  1. Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

PMID: 29234555 PMCID: PMC5717479 DOI: 10.26603/ijspt20171034

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In addition to established interventions, dry needling may reduce impairments leading to greater functional abilities for individuals following ankle sprain.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare effects of spinal and peripheral dry needling (DN) with peripheral DN alone on impairments and functional performance among individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.

METHODS: Twenty individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain (18 bilateral, 2 unilateral) participated in this study (4 males, 16 females; mean age 28.9 + /- 9.2 years). During the first of two sessions, participants completed the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) and their strength, unilateral balance, and unilateral hop test performance was assessed. Participants were randomly assigned to a spinal and peripheral DN group (SPDN), or a peripheral only DN group (PDN). Participants in the SPDN site group received DN to bilateral L5 multifidi and fibularis longus and brevis muscles on the involved lower extremity. Participants in the PDN group received DN to the fibularis muscles alone. Participants' strength, balance and hop test performance were reassessed immediately following the intervention, and at follow-up 6-7 days later, all outcome measures were reassessed. Three-way mixed model ANOVAs and Mann-Whitney U tests assessed between group differences for outcome variables with normal distributions and non-normal distributions, respectively.

RESULTS: ANOVAs showed significant group by time interaction (p<0.05) for invertor strength, significant side by group and time by group interactions (p<0.05) for plantarflexor-evertor strength, no significant findings for dorsiflexor-invertor strength, significant side by time interaction (p<0.05) for unilateral balance, significant main effect of time (p<0.05) for triple hop for distance test, and significant main effect of side (p<0.05) for the CAIT. Mann-Whitney U tests showed no significance (p>0.05) for the side hop test or FADI.

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that DN of the multifidi in addition to fibularis muscles does not result in improvements in strength, unilateral balance or unilateral hop test performance, compared to DN the fibularis muscles alone among individuals with a history of ankle sprain.

Keywords: Dry needling; functional performance tests; lateral ankle sprain

References

  1. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Apr 27;29(2):273-278 - PubMed
  2. Phys Ther. 1993 Jun;73(6):346-51; discussion 351-4 - PubMed
  3. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;83(5):368-74, quiz 375-7, 389 - PubMed
  4. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2004 Dec;8(6):468-75 - PubMed
  5. Phys Ther Rev. 2014 Aug;19(4):252-265 - PubMed
  6. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Aug;17(8):348 - PubMed
  7. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006 Sep;11(3):659-62 - PubMed
  8. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;43(9):620-34 - PubMed
  9. J Altern Complement Med. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(6):617-24 - PubMed
  10. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):769-76 - PubMed
  11. J Sport Rehabil. 2017 Nov;26(6):507-517 - PubMed
  12. Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2):37-52 - PubMed
  13. Acupunct Med. 2012 Dec;30(4):286-90 - PubMed
  14. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:204-9 - PubMed
  15. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:790209 - PubMed
  16. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2011;69(1):17-26 - PubMed
  17. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Jan 23;4:5 - PubMed
  18. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;43(9):A1-40 - PubMed
  19. J Athl Train. 2012 Nov-Dec;47(6):621-6 - PubMed
  20. J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4):364-375 - PubMed
  21. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):513-8 - PubMed
  22. J Athl Train. 2005 Mar;40(1):35-40 - PubMed
  23. Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;87(3):337-49 - PubMed
  24. Psychol Med. 1988 Nov;18(4):1007-19 - PubMed
  25. J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4):376-380 - PubMed
  26. Brain. 1992 Jun;115 ( Pt 3):915-34 - PubMed
  27. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Nov 15;150(10):1117-27 - PubMed
  28. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Nov;19(4):223-7 - PubMed
  29. Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Aug;16(3):242-7 - PubMed
  30. Pain. 1997 Jan;69(1-2):65-73 - PubMed
  31. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):640-6 - PubMed
  32. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011 Aug;4(4):226-34 - PubMed

Publication Types