Display options
Share it on

Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2018 Mar - Apr;18(2):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 26.

Correlation between the sudden jump-like increases of the atrio-Hisian interval induced during burst atrial pacing and during programmed atrial stimulation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Iskra H Bayraktarova, Milko K Stoyanov, Boyan T Kunev, Tchavdar N Shalganov

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, National Heart Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  2. Department of Cardiology, National Heart Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 29183712 PMCID: PMC5998202 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.11.003

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the correlation between the sudden prolongations of the atrio-Hisian (AH) interval with ≥50 ms during burst and programmed atrial stimulation, and to define whether the AH jump during burst atrial pacing is a reliable diagnostic criterion for dual AV nodal physiology.

METHODS: Retrospective data on 304 patients with preliminary ECG diagnosis of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), confirmed during electrophysiological study, was analyzed for the presence of AH jump during burst and programmed atrial stimulation, and for correlation between the pacing modes for inducing the jump. Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and Spearman's bivariate correlation coefficient were applied, significant was P-value <0.05.

RESULTS: The population was aged 48.5 ± 15.7 (12-85) years; males were 38.5%. AH jump occurred during burst atrial pacing in 81% of the patients, and during programmed stimulation - in 78%, P = 0.366. In 63.2% AH jump was induced by both pacing modes; in 17.8% - only by burst pacing; in 14.8% - only by programmed pacing; in 4.2% there was no inducible jump. There was negative correlation between both pacing modes, ρ = -0.204, Р<0.001.

CONCLUSION: Burst and programmed atrial stimulation separately prove the presence of dual AV nodal physiology in 81 and 78% of the patients with AVNRT, respectively. There is negative correlation between the two pacing modes, allowing the combination of the two methods to prove diagnostic in 95.8% of the patients.

Copyright © 2017 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: AH jump; AV nodal reentrant tachycardia; Burst atrial pacing; Dual atrioventricular nodal physiology; Programmed atrial stimulation

References

  1. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2002 Dec;6(4):414-21 - PubMed
  2. Circ Res. 1975 Jun;36(6):782-90 - PubMed
  3. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Apr;7(4):287-94 - PubMed
  4. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Sep;26(9):1849-55 - PubMed
  5. Circulation. 1971 May;43(5):679-87 - PubMed
  6. Circulation. 1973 Sep;48(3):549-55 - PubMed
  7. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct;29(10):1096-104 - PubMed
  8. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Oct;28(4):1000-4 - PubMed
  9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Oct;6(4):927-32 - PubMed
  10. Am Heart J. 1996 Oct;132(4):758-64 - PubMed
  11. Br Heart J. 1975 Oct;37(10):1069-76 - PubMed
  12. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2016 Sep - Oct;57(5):340-344 - PubMed

Publication Types