World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Dec 15;9(12):475-491. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i12.475.
Laparoscopic .
World journal of gastrointestinal oncology
Ionut Negoi, Sorin Hostiuc, Ruxandra Irina Negoi, Mircea Beuran
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of General Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania. [email protected].
- National Institute of Legal Medicine Mina Minovici, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania.
- Department of Anatomy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania.
- Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest 014461, Romania.
PMID: 29290918
PMCID: PMC5740088 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i12.475
Abstract
AIM: To compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (L-CME) with its open (O-CME) counterpart.
METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trails, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SciELO, and Korean Journal databases from their inception until May 2017. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that included patients with colonic cancer comparing L-CME and O-CME. Primary outcomes included the quality of the resected specimen (lymph nodes retrieved, complete mesocolic plane excision, tumor to arterial high tie, resected mesocolon surface). Secondary outcomes included the three-year and five-year overall and disease-free survival rates, recurrence of the disease, surgical data, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Two authors of the review screened the methodological quality of the eligible trials and independently extracted data from individual studies.
RESULTS: A total of one RCT and eleven CCTs (four from Europe and seven from Asia) met the inclusion criteria for the current meta-analysis. These studies involved 1619 patients in L-CME and 1477 patients in O-CME. The L-CME was associated with the same quality of the resected specimen, with no differences regarding the retrieved lymphnodes (MD = -1.06, 95%CI: -3.65 to 1.53,
CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic approach offers the same quality of the resected specimen as the open approach in complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer. The laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation is superior in all perioperative results and at least non-inferior in long-term oncological outcomes.
Keywords: Central vascular ligation; Colon cancer; Complete mesocolic excision; D3 lymphadenectomy
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
References
- Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):300-8 - PubMed
- Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):477-84 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2007 Oct;246(4):655-62; discussion 662-4 - PubMed
- Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):44-52 - PubMed
- N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9 - PubMed
- ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6 - PubMed
- Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;40(11):1494-501 - PubMed
- Surg Endosc. 2004 Apr;18(4):577-81 - PubMed
- Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr;57(4):415-22 - PubMed
- Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jan;23(1):35-47 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):728-38 - PubMed
- Dig Surg. 2016;33(2):114-20 - PubMed
- Colorectal Dis. 2012 Nov;14(11):1357-64 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1718-26 - PubMed
- Int J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb;17(1):1-29 - PubMed
- Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88 - PubMed
- J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Dec;14(6):329-34 - PubMed
- Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1183-98 - PubMed
- J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Aug;26(8):606-13 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1763-9 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8 - PubMed
- Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):23-30 - PubMed
- Am J Surg. 2016 Sep;212(3):511-26 - PubMed
- Int J Surg. 2015 Nov;23(Pt A):12-7 - PubMed
- Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;15(1):24-7 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):728-33 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):272-8 - PubMed
- Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep;44(9):799-806 - PubMed
- Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Apr;16(2):127-138 - PubMed
- World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7926-32 - PubMed
- Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):354-64; discussion 364-5 - PubMed
- Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):75-82 - PubMed
- Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Aug;23(8):795-800 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2002 Jun 29;359(9325):2224-9 - PubMed
- Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:151-7 - PubMed
- Ann Surg. 2008 Jul;248(1):1-7 - PubMed
- Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1508-18 - PubMed
- BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Apr 20;5:13 - PubMed
- BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 - PubMed
- Chirurg. 2007 Mar;78(3):217-25 - PubMed
- Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jan;55(1):42-50 - PubMed
- Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;21(7):2288-94 - PubMed
- Chir Ital. 2008 Jan-Feb;60(1):1-7 - PubMed
- Surg Today. 2014 May;44(5):868-74 - PubMed
- Dig Surg. 2013;30(4-6):317-27 - PubMed
- Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jan;14(1):109-17 - PubMed
Publication Types