Display options
Share it on

Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Dec 18;5(12):2325967117744758. doi: 10.1177/2325967117744758. eCollection 2017 Dec.

The Utility of Objective Strength and Functional Performance to Predict Subjective Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine

Heather Menzer, Lindsay V Slater, David Diduch, Mark Miller, Grant Norte, John Goetschius, Joseph M Hart

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
  2. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Neuromechanics of Impaired Locomotion Lab, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  3. School of Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
  4. Department of Exercise Science and Athletic Training, Adrian College, Adrian, Michigan, USA.

PMID: 29318168 PMCID: PMC5753987 DOI: 10.1177/2325967117744758

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many clinicians release patients to return to activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) based on time from surgery despite deficits in muscle strength and function. It is unclear whether symmetry or unilateral performance is the best predictor of subjective outcomes after ACLR.

PURPOSE: To determine physical performance predictors of patient-reported outcomes after reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS: A total of 88 participants (49 males, 39 females; mean ± SD height, 174.0 ± 9.6 cm; weight, 76.1 ± 18.5 kg; age, 19.4 ± 3.7 years) who underwent primary, unilateral ACLR volunteered for this study. Participants had undergone reconstruction a mean of 6.9 ± 1.8 months (range, 5.0-14.1 months) before the study. All participants underwent strength testing as well as hop testing and then completed the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. Stepwise linear regression models were used for symmetry and unilateral performance to identify the proportion of variance explained in the IKDC score, KOOS total score, KOOS-sport subscale, and time from surgery, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses on those variables that explained the most variance in patient-reported outcomes to determine cutoff thresholds.

RESULTS: No significant correlations were found between time from surgery and objective performance. The only significant predictors of IKDC score were single-hop limb symmetry index (LSI) and age (

CONCLUSION: Hopping performance is the most predictive functional variable of subjective outcomes after reconstruction. Single-hop symmetry was most important for younger patients and unilateral triple-hop distance was most important for older patients. Clinicians should consider hopping performance when making return-to-activity decisions after ACLR.

Keywords: knee injury; rehabilitation; return to play

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution.

References

  1. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):36-46 - PubMed
  2. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10 ):2256-63 - PubMed
  3. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Apr;19(4):406-10 - PubMed
  4. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):345-53 - PubMed
  5. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jan;23 (1):21-8, 28.e1-3 - PubMed
  6. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10 ):2363-70 - PubMed
  7. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23 (12 ):3623-31 - PubMed
  8. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Jan 21;2(1):2325967113518305 - PubMed
  9. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Feb;4(1):2-12 - PubMed
  10. Arthroscopy. 2011 Dec;27(12 ):1697-705 - PubMed
  11. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7 - PubMed
  12. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1549-58 - PubMed
  13. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):848-56 - PubMed
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1662-9 - PubMed
  15. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1567-73 - PubMed
  16. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Jul;28(1):23-31 - PubMed
  17. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1671-7 - PubMed
  18. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1470-7 - PubMed
  19. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1534-40 - PubMed
  20. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96 - PubMed
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1583-90 - PubMed
  22. Orthopedics. 2014 Feb;37(2):e103-8 - PubMed
  23. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):41-8 - PubMed
  24. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2820-2826 - PubMed
  25. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):128-35 - PubMed
  26. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1305-10 - PubMed
  27. Gait Posture. 2017 Jan;51:268-274 - PubMed
  28. Ergonomics. 2005 Sep 15-Nov 15;48(11-14):1568-75 - PubMed
  29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Sep;84-A(9):1560-72 - PubMed
  30. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):336-42 - PubMed
  31. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):762-70 - PubMed
  32. Am J Sports Med. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):513-8 - PubMed
  33. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2727-37 - PubMed
  34. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13 - PubMed
  35. Knee. 2014 Dec;21(6):1039-45 - PubMed
  36. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Jul;50(13):804-8 - PubMed
  37. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;48(21):1543-52 - PubMed
  38. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1391-8 - PubMed
  39. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(9):750-9 - PubMed
  40. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2242-9 - PubMed
  41. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):216-24 - PubMed

Publication Types