Display options
Share it on

Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;55(1):22-26. doi: 10.5152/tao.2017.2038. Epub 2017 Mar 01.

Vidian Canal Types and Dehiscence of the Bony Roof of the Canal: An Anatomical Study.

Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology

Yakup Yeğin, Mustafa Çelik, Ahmet Altıntaş, Baver Maşallah Şimşek, Burak Olgun, Fatma Tülin Kayhan

Affiliations

  1. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Bak?rköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital ?stanbul, Turkey.
  2. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Fatih Medical Park Hospital, ?stanbul, Turkey.

PMID: 29392047 PMCID: PMC5782923 DOI: 10.5152/tao.2017.2038

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of Vidian canal types and dehiscence of the bony roof of the canal.

METHODS: This study included 594 patients (391 males and 203 females; average age, 32.43±11.98 years; range, 18-65 years). Computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed in terms of the prevalence of Vidian canal types and dehiscence of the bony roof of the canal.

RESULTS: Vidian canal types 1, 2, and 3 based on the sphenoid sinus body were found on the right side in 33.8%, 29.7%, and 6.5%, and on the left side in 36.4%, 27.4%, and 36.2% of the patients, respectively. Dehiscence of the bony roof of the canal was found on the right side in 22.2% of the patients and on the left side in 26.6%. In terms of Vidian canal types based on the sphenoid sinus floor, types 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found on the right side in 53.5%, 27.4%, 7.6%, and 11.5%, and on the left side in 54.9%, 26.6%, 6.6%, and 11.9% of the patients, respectively. On the right side, Vidian canal type 2 was significantly (p=0.002) more frequent in males than in females.

CONCLUSION: When studying the complex anatomy of the sphenoid sinus, it is essential to consider Vidian canal types. Before endoscopic sinus surgery the Vidian canal and other anatomical structures should be carefully evaluated in all patients during preoperative paranasal sinus CT imaging to avoid complications.

Keywords: Sphenoid sinus; Vidian canal; dehiscence

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

References

  1. Neurosurgery. 2006 Jul;59(1):201-3; discussion 201-3 - PubMed
  2. J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Oct;27(7):1866-1869 - PubMed
  3. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E6 - PubMed
  4. Eurasian J Med. 2013 Jun;45(2):115-25 - PubMed
  5. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016 Mar;17(1):32-7 - PubMed
  6. Rhinology. 2005 Jun;43(2):109-14 - PubMed
  7. Eur Radiol. 2000;10 (5):844-8 - PubMed
  8. B-ENT. 2013;9(2):117-21 - PubMed
  9. Clin Anat. 2007 Oct;20(7):751-4 - PubMed
  10. Neuroradiology. 1996 May;38 Suppl 1:S120-6 - PubMed
  11. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jun;136(6):595-602 - PubMed
  12. Laryngoscope. 1987 Aug;97(8 Pt 3 Suppl 43):1-9 - PubMed
  13. Pak J Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 15;12 (6):522-5 - PubMed
  14. Am J Rhinol. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):197-202 - PubMed
  15. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006 May;28(2):195-201 - PubMed
  16. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;268(6):851-6 - PubMed
  17. Libyan J Med. 2008 Sep 01;3(3):128-33 - PubMed
  18. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1382-8 - PubMed
  19. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul - Aug;83(4):381-387 - PubMed
  20. Laryngoscope. 2007 Aug;117(8):1338-42 - PubMed
  21. Laryngoscope. 2013 Apr;123(4):811-5 - PubMed

Publication Types