Display options
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 03;8(1):601-616. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3609. eCollection 2018 Jan.

Nutrient stoichiometry and land use rather than species richness determine plant functional diversity.

Ecology and evolution

Verena Busch, Valentin H Klaus, Caterina Penone, Deborah Schäfer, Steffen Boch, Daniel Prati, Jörg Müller, Stephanie A Socher, Ülo Niinemets, Josep Peñuelas, Norbert Hölzel, Markus Fischer, Till Kleinebecker

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Landscape Ecology Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster Muenster Germany.
  2. Institute for Agricultural Sciences, Grassland Sciences ETZ Zürich Zürich Switzerland.
  3. Institute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
  4. Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.
  5. Institute of Biochemistry and Biology University of Potsdam Potsdam Germany.
  6. Institute for Ecology and Evolution University of Salzburg Salzburg Austria.
  7. Department of Plant Physiology Estonian University of Life Sciences Tartu Estonia.
  8. Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona Barcelona Spain.
  9. CREAF Cerdanyola del Vallès Spain.

PMID: 29321897 PMCID: PMC5756835 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3609

Abstract

Plant functional traits reflect individual and community ecological strategies. They allow the detection of directional changes in community dynamics and ecosystemic processes, being an additional tool to assess biodiversity than species richness. Analysis of functional patterns in plant communities provides mechanistic insight into biodiversity alterations due to anthropogenic activity. Although studies have consi-dered of either anthropogenic management or nutrient availability on functional traits in temperate grasslands, studies combining effects of both drivers are scarce. Here, we assessed the impacts of management intensity (fertilization, mowing, grazing), nutrient stoichiometry (C, N, P, K), and vegetation composition on community-weighted means (CWMs) and functional diversity (Rao's

Keywords: biodiversity exploratories; fertilization; leaf economics; mowing; nutrient availability; nutrient ratios; phosphorus; plant functional traits; plant strategies; seed mass

References

  1. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 04;9(12):e114290 - PubMed
  2. Ecol Lett. 2010 Sep;13(9):1085-93 - PubMed
  3. Ecol Lett. 2010 Jan;13(1):76-86 - PubMed
  4. Science. 1995 Jul 21;269(5222):347-50 - PubMed
  5. Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1770-4 - PubMed
  6. Ann Bot. 2011 Nov;108(7):1337-45 - PubMed
  7. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 May;21(5):261-8 - PubMed
  8. Ecology. 2011 Jun;92(6):1353-65 - PubMed
  9. Ecol Lett. 2009 Dec;12(12):1405-19 - PubMed
  10. Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):598-611 - PubMed
  11. Ann Bot. 2007 May;99(5):967-85 - PubMed
  12. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Mar;19(3):892-9 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 28;102(26):9212-7 - PubMed
  14. Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7 - PubMed
  15. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Dec;11(12):494-7 - PubMed
  16. Nat Plants. 2015 Jul 06;1:15080 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):234-42 - PubMed
  18. Nature. 2014 Jan 2;505(7481):82-6 - PubMed
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 24;103(4):956-61 - PubMed
  20. Ecol Evol. 2017 Dec 03;8(1):601-616 - PubMed

Publication Types