Display options
Share it on

BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jan 09;7(1):e000090. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000090. eCollection 2018.

Ensuring adequate vascular access in patients with major trauma: a quality improvement initiative.

BMJ open quality

Kevin Verhoeff, Rachelle Saybel, Pamela Mathura, Bonnie Tsang, Vanessa Fawcett, Sandy Widder

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  2. Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  3. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

PMID: 29333494 PMCID: PMC5759737 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000090

Abstract

Ensuring adequate vascular access in major trauma patients prior to decompensative physiological processes is crucial to patient outcomes. Most protocols suggest achieving two 18-gauge or larger intravenous lines immediately in patients with major trauma. We discuss a quality improvement approach to ensure that >90% of patients with major trauma (as defined by an injury severity score ≥12) at a level one trauma centre receive timely and adequate fluid access. Applying Donabedian principles for process improvement, we used the Alberta Trauma Registry to perform a 4-month chart audit on patients with major trauma at the University of Alberta Hospital. Background data were supported with a formal root cause analysis to outline the problems and generate plan, do, study and act (PDSA) rapid change cycles. These PDSA cycles were then implemented over the course of 2 months to alter system and personnel barriers to care, thereby ensuring that patients with major trauma received adequate vascular access for fluid resuscitation. This was followed by a 6-month sustainability assessment. The percentage of patients with major trauma who received adequate fluid access went from a mean of 55.5% to >90% in 2 months and was sustained at or greater than 90% for 6 consecutive months. The formal application of quality improvement processes is uncommon in trauma care but is much needed to ensure success and sustainability of quality initiatives. Planning including engagement and prechange awareness is crucial to staff engagement, change, and sustainment. Formal quality improvement and change management techniques can elicit rapid and sustainable changes in trauma care. We provide a framework for change to increase compliance with fluid access in patients with major trauma.

Keywords: Intravenous access; Trauma; compliance; emergency department; quality improvement

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  1. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2013 Apr;26(2):120-3 - PubMed
  2. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II46-54 - PubMed
  3. Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):77-82 - PubMed
  4. World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2400-6 - PubMed
  5. J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):389-402 - PubMed
  6. Infect Control. 1986 May;7(5):259-62 - PubMed
  7. Front Health Serv Manage. 2009 Fall;26(1):15-26 - PubMed
  8. Crit Care. 2011;15(6):242 - PubMed
  9. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II2-45 - PubMed
  10. J Hosp Infect. 2006 Jan;62(1):64-70 - PubMed
  11. Healthc Q. 2009;12 Spec No Patient:102-9 - PubMed
  12. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):358-63, table of contents - PubMed
  13. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug;21(8):627-33 - PubMed
  14. JAMA. 2015 May 5;313(17):1707-8 - PubMed
  15. Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:42-9 - PubMed
  16. BMJ. 2010 Feb 04;340:c309 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30 - PubMed

Publication Types