Display options
Share it on

J Fungi (Basel). 2017 Dec 28;4(1). doi: 10.3390/jof4010005.

Recent Insights into the Paradoxical Effect of Echinocandins.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)

Johannes Wagener, Veronika Loiko

Affiliations

  1. Max von Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, LMU München, 80336 Munich, Germany. [email protected].
  2. Institut für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. [email protected].
  3. Max von Pettenkofer-Institut für Hygiene und Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische Fakultät, LMU München, 80336 Munich, Germany. [email protected].

PMID: 29371498 PMCID: PMC5872308 DOI: 10.3390/jof4010005

Abstract

Echinocandin antifungals represent one of the most important drug classes for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. The mode of action of the echinocandins relies on inhibition of the β-1,3-glucan synthase, an enzyme essentially required for the synthesis of the major fungal cell wall carbohydrate β-1,3-glucan. Depending on the species, echinocandins may exert fungicidal or fungistatic activity. Apparently independent of this differential activity, a surprising in vitro phenomenon called the "paradoxical effect" can be observed. The paradoxical effect is characterized by the ability of certain fungal isolates to reconstitute growth in the presence of higher echinocandin concentrations, while being fully susceptible at lower concentrations. The nature of the paradoxical effect is not fully understood and has been the focus of multiple studies in the last two decades. Here we concisely review the current literature and propose an updated model for the paradoxical effect, taking into account recent advances in the field.

Keywords: Fks1; anidulafungin; antifungals; caspofungin; echinocandin; echinocandins; glucan synthase; micafungin; paradoxical effect; paradoxical growth

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mol Microbiol. 2015 Feb;95(3):458-71 - PubMed
  2. J Microbiol. 2010 Apr;48(2):170-3 - PubMed
  3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jun;55(6):2641-7 - PubMed
  4. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Dec;56(12):6304-9 - PubMed
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jan;46(1):12-23 - PubMed
  6. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;15(10):5671-81 - PubMed
  7. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1): - PubMed
  8. J Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 1;209(3):473-81 - PubMed
  9. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Oct;71(10 ):2868-73 - PubMed
  10. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Oct;53(10 ):4377-84 - PubMed
  11. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Mar;51(3):173-8 - PubMed
  12. J Infect Dis. 2000 Dec;182(6):1791-5 - PubMed
  13. Ann Hematol. 2014 Jan;93(1):13-32 - PubMed
  14. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Aug;40(8):1811-6 - PubMed
  15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Sep;32(9):1331-5 - PubMed
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Nov;41(11):2471-9 - PubMed
  17. J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Dec;139(12 ):3071-8 - PubMed
  18. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 Dec;18(12 ):42 - PubMed
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Sep;51(9):3081-8 - PubMed
  20. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2): - PubMed
  21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Apr;57(4):1625-31 - PubMed
  22. MBio. 2017 Jun 20;8(3): - PubMed
  23. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Sep;50(9):3160-1 - PubMed
  24. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jan;52(1):321-8 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Feb;27(2):127-31 - PubMed
  26. Adv Genet. 2013;81:33-82 - PubMed
  27. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Aug;56(8):4268-76 - PubMed
  28. J Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;190(8):1464-71 - PubMed
  29. Drugs. 2011 Jan 1;71(1):11-41 - PubMed
  30. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Apr;50(4):1293-7 - PubMed
  31. Cell Microbiol. 2016 Sep;18(9):1308-16 - PubMed
  32. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Oct 21;60(11):6872-6879 - PubMed
  33. Med Mycol. 2009;47 Suppl 1:S369-75 - PubMed
  34. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Sep;44(9):2547-8 - PubMed
  35. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Feb 15;62(4):e1-50 - PubMed
  36. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Feb;53(2):476-82 - PubMed
  37. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 1;61 Suppl 6:S669-77 - PubMed
  38. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Dec;45(12 ):3310-21 - PubMed
  39. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 May;61(5):1140-4 - PubMed
  40. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Sep;48(9):3407-11 - PubMed
  41. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jan;55(1):302-10 - PubMed
  42. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Sep;53(9):3690-9 - PubMed
  43. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Nov 10;5(5):a019653 - PubMed
  44. Eukaryot Cell. 2012 Nov;11(11):1324-32 - PubMed
  45. Future Microbiol. 2012 May;7(5):565-9 - PubMed
  46. PLoS Pathog. 2008 Apr 04;4(4):e1000040 - PubMed
  47. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Mar 24;61(4):null - PubMed
  48. J Pharm Pract. 2015 Apr;28(2):175-82 - PubMed
  49. J Bacteriol. 1999 Jan;181(2):444-53 - PubMed
  50. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jun 15;48(12 ):1676-84 - PubMed
  51. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jan;53(1):112-22 - PubMed
  52. Microbiology. 1994 Sep;140 ( Pt 9):2239-46 - PubMed
  53. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014 Nov;55(11):2572-6 - PubMed
  54. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Oct 1;45(7):883-93 - PubMed
  55. Eukaryot Cell. 2012 Jul;11(7):952-60 - PubMed
  56. Med Mycol. 2014 Feb;52(2):131-139 - PubMed
  57. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jul;55(7):3598-602 - PubMed
  58. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Dec;53(12):5297-9 - PubMed
  59. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Jan;57(1):326-32 - PubMed
  60. Mol Microbiol. 2012 Feb;83(3):506-19 - PubMed
  61. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 Feb;39(3):157-64 - PubMed
  62. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Jun;51(6):2257-9 - PubMed
  63. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(2):1071-83 - PubMed
  64. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Apr;54(4):1555-63 - PubMed
  65. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Sep 22;61(10 ): - PubMed

Publication Types