Display options
Share it on

Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 May 30;1:15. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z. eCollection 2016.

Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions-a pseudo-randomised trial.

Advances in simulation (London, England)

Neil J Cunningham, Robert O'Brien, Tracey Weiland, Julian van Dijk, Stuart Dilley

Affiliations

  1. 1St Vincent's Clinical Education and Simulation Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, PO Box 2900, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Melbourne, 3065 Australia.
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  3. 3Department of Medical Education, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
  4. 4Emergency Medicine Practice Innovation Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

PMID: 29449984 PMCID: PMC5806281 DOI: 10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Placement Enhancement Program (CPEP) is a simulation course for medical students learning the core topics of cardiovascular and respiratory medicine, incorporating patient safety and professionalism teaching and based on adult learning principles and proven educational theory. The aims of this study are to assess whether the CPEP delivered at the beginning of a clinical rotation would result in competency outcomes that are at least equivalent to those achieved through a standard 6-week programme and whether this programme would increase student confidence levels in assessing and managing patients with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions.

METHODS: This was a pseudo-randomised control trial between two groups of medical students from one clinical school. The intervention group participated in CPEP, a 4-day immersive simulation course, in the first week of their cardiac and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The control group participants attended the normal programme of the 6-week cardiovascular and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The programme and student competence was assessed using Observed Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-reported confidence surveys.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OSCE scoring between the intervention group (examined in week one of their clinical rotation following CPEP) and the control group (examined at the end of their full clinical rotation). Students exposed to CPEP started their clinical rotation with confidence levels similar to those reported by the control group at the end of their rotation. Confidence levels of CPEP students were higher at the end of the rotation compared to those of the control group.

CONCLUSIONS: Based on OSCE results, immersion into a 4-day simulation-based teaching programme at the start of a clinical rotation resulted in skill competency levels that were equivalent to those obtained after a full clinical rotation of 6 weeks. CPEP improved students' confidence levels in the assessment and management of patients presenting with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. Simulation utilised in courses such as CPEP has the potential to enhance the overall learning experience in medical school clinical rotations.

Keywords: Clinical competence; Clinical medicine; Education, curriculum; Education, medical, undergraduate; Educational assessment; Patient simulation

References

  1. Med J Aust. 2003 Feb 17;178(4):163-6 - PubMed
  2. Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):e1447-63 - PubMed
  3. Hawaii Med J. 2010 Jan;69(1):4-7 - PubMed
  4. Med Educ. 2004 Oct;38(10):1095-102 - PubMed
  5. Med Educ. 2004 Jan;38(1):56-66 - PubMed
  6. Fam Med. 2008 Sep;40(8):574-8 - PubMed
  7. Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28 - PubMed
  8. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19 Suppl 2:i34-43 - PubMed
  9. Br Med J. 1975 Feb 22;1(5955):447-51 - PubMed
  10. Med Educ. 2005 Jun;39(6):580-7 - PubMed
  11. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i2-10 - PubMed
  12. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Jun;25(2):361-76 - PubMed
  13. Med J Aust. 2003 Feb 17;178(4):147-8 - PubMed
  14. Med Educ. 2002 Jan;36(1):16-25 - PubMed

Publication Types