Display options
Share it on

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 23;13(2):e0193378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193378. eCollection 2018.

The impact of poverty reduction and development interventions on non-communicable diseases and their behavioural risk factors in low and lower-middle income countries: A systematic review.

PloS one

Jessie Pullar, Luke Allen, Nick Townsend, Julianne Williams, Charlie Foster, Nia Roberts, Mike Rayner, Bente Mikkelsen, Francesco Branca, Kremlin Wickramasinghe

Affiliations

  1. British Heart Foundation Centre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  2. Health Library, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  3. WHO Global Coordination Mechanism on Non-Communicable Diseases, WHO Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland.

PMID: 29474454 PMCID: PMC5825092 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193378

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) disproportionately affect low- and lower-middle income countries (LLMICs) where 80% of global NCD related deaths occur. LLMICs are the primary focus of interventions to address development and poverty indicators. We aimed to synthesise the evidence of these interventions' impact on the four primary NCDs (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease and cancer) and their common behavioural risk factors (unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, tobacco and alcohol use).

METHODS: We systematically searched four online databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Global Health) for primary research conducted in LLMICS, published between January 1st 1990 and February 15th 2016. Studies involved development or poverty interventions which reported on outcomes relating to NCDs. We extracted summary level data on study design, population, health outcomes and potential confounders.

RESULTS: From 6383 search results, 29 studies from 24 LLMICs published between 1999 and 2015 met our inclusion criteria. The quality of included studies was limited and heterogeneity of outcome measures required narrative synthesis. One study measured impact on NCD prevalence, one physical activity and 27 dietary components. The majority of papers (23), involved agricultural interventions. Primary outcome measures tended to focus on undernutrition. Intensive agricultural interventions were associated with improved calorie, vitamin, fruit and vegetable intake. However, positive impacts were reliant on participant's land ownership, infection status and limited in generalisability. Just three studies measured adult obesity; two indicated increased income and consequential food affordability had the potential to increase obesity. Overall, there was poor alignment between included studies outcome measures and the key policy options and objectives of the Global Action Plan on NCDs.

CONCLUSIONS: Though many interventions addressing poverty and development have great potential to impact on NCD prevalence and risk, most fail to measure or report these outcomes. Current evidence is limited to behavioural risk factors, namely diet and suggests a positive impact of agricultural-based food security programmes on dietary indicators. However, studies investigating the impact of improved income on obesity tend to show an increased risk. Embedding NCD impact evaluation into development programmes is crucial in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals and the rapid epidemiological transitions facing LLMICs.

References

  1. Lancet. 2013 Aug 10;382(9891):536-51 - PubMed
  2. Public Health Nutr. 2004 Feb;7(1A):101-21 - PubMed
  3. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 1999 Sep;49(3):244-52 - PubMed
  4. J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):4006S-4009S - PubMed
  5. Food Nutr Bull. 2009 Dec;30(4):355-69 - PubMed
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Dec;94(6):1632-42 - PubMed
  7. AIDS. 2015 Sep 10;29(14):1889-94 - PubMed
  8. J Nutr. 2008 Nov;138(11):2250-7 - PubMed
  9. J Nutr. 2005 Jun;135(6):1423-9 - PubMed
  10. Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4342-8 - PubMed
  11. Food Nutr Bull. 2005 Jun;26(2):198-208 - PubMed
  12. Br J Nutr. 2012 Jul 14;108(1):163-76 - PubMed
  13. Public Health Nutr. 2000 Dec;3(4):425-31 - PubMed
  14. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 01;(8):CD009382 - PubMed
  15. J Nutr. 2007 May;137(5):1320-7 - PubMed
  16. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e75089 - PubMed
  17. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Mar;5(3):e277-e289 - PubMed
  18. J Nutr. 2012 Oct;142(10):1871-80 - PubMed
  19. Pac Health Dialog. 2011 Mar;17 (1):173-84 - PubMed
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD008137 - PubMed
  21. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2007 Oct;42(12):1909-17 - PubMed
  22. Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2287-323 - PubMed
  23. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):854-60 - PubMed
  24. J Nutr. 2015 Feb;145(2):335-43 - PubMed
  25. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015 Apr-Jun;18(2):466-75 - PubMed
  26. Global Health. 2014 Dec 11;10:81 - PubMed
  27. PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 02;11(9):e1001714 - PubMed
  28. J Nutr. 2015 Jun;145(6):1317-24 - PubMed
  29. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support