Display options
Share it on

J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Apr;51(2):345-351. doi: 10.1002/jaba.453. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

An evaluation of the agreement between the conservative dual-criterion method and expert visual analysis.

Journal of applied behavior analysis

Katie Wolfe, Michael A Seaman, Erik Drasgow, Phillip Sherlock

Affiliations

  1. University of South Carolina.

PMID: 29574711 DOI: 10.1002/jaba.453

Abstract

The conservative dual-criterion (CDC) method was developed to standardize the analysis of single-subject experimental designs data, but to date its accuracy has been evaluated only by comparing results to the statistical parameters of graphs. Our study investigated agreement between expert visual analysts and the CDC method on 66 AB tiers from published multiple baseline graphs. We found strong agreement between the two methods for certain types of graphs and discuss implications of the findings and areas for future research.

© 2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Keywords: single-subject experimental design; visual analysis; visual inspection

MeSH terms

Publication Types