Display options
Cite
Henriksen HB, Carlsen MH, Paur I, et al. Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients. Food Nutr Res. 2018;62doi: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1306.
Henriksen, H. B., Carlsen, M. H., Paur, I., Berntsen, S., Bøhn, S. K., Skjetne, A. J., Kværner, A. S., Henriksen, C., Andersen, L. F., Smeland, S., & Blomhoff, R. (2018). Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients. Food & nutrition research, 62. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v62.1306
Henriksen, Hege Berg, et al. "Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients." Food & nutrition research vol. 62 (2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v62.1306
Henriksen HB, Carlsen MH, Paur I, Berntsen S, Bøhn SK, Skjetne AJ, Kværner AS, Henriksen C, Andersen LF, Smeland S, Blomhoff R. Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients. Food Nutr Res. 2018 Feb 22;62. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1306. eCollection 2018. PMID: 29545734; PMCID: PMC5846207.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Food Nutr Res. 2018 Feb 22;62. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1306. eCollection 2018.

Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients.

Food & nutrition research

Hege Berg Henriksen, Monica Hauger Carlsen, Ingvild Paur, Sveinung Berntsen, Siv Kjølsrud Bøhn, Anne Juul Skjetne, Ane Sørlie Kværner, Christine Henriksen, Lene Frost Andersen, Sigbjørn Smeland, Rune Blomhoff

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  2. Faculty of Health and Sports Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
  3. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  4. Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  5. Department of Clinical Service, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

PMID: 29545734 PMCID: PMC5846207 DOI: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1306

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) aim at reducing the risk of developing chronic diseases and promote overall health. We studied the effect of the Norwegian FBDG in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. There is a need for a time-efficient dietary assessment tool measuring adherence to these guidelines in patients treated for dietary dependent cancer, such as CRC patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new short food frequency questionnaire (NORDIET-FFQ), developed to estimate adherence to the Norwegian FBDG among CRC patients.

DESIGN: Eighty-one CRC patients from both study groups in the Norwegian Dietary Guidelines and Colorectal Cancer Survival study, an ongoing dietary intervention, completed both the short 63-item NORDIET-FFQ and a 7-day weighed food record.

RESULTS: The NORDIET-FFQ was on group level able to estimate intakes of fruits, vegetables, unsalted nuts, fish, fatty fish, high fat dairy products, unprocessed meat, processed meat, red meat, water, sugar-rich beverages, alcoholic drinks, and sugar- and fat-rich foods. Ranking of individuals according to intake was good (

CONCLUSIONS: The NORDIET-FFQ showed good ability in to estimate intakes of plant-based foods, fish, dairy products, meat, and energy-dense foods; adequate ranking of individuals according to intake of most recommendations except for unprocessed meat, processed meat, and vegetables; and importantly a good ability to identify those patients in need of dietary counselling for foods that are known to modulate the risk of CRC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT01570010.

Keywords: cancer; dietary assessment tool; dietary intake; food based dietary guidelines; validity; weighed food records

Conflict of interest statement

All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. This project has received funding from the Research Council of Norway, Throne Holst Foundation of Nutrition Research, Norwegian Cancer

References

  1. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jul;122(1):51-65 - PubMed
  2. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2006 Oct;19(5):321-30 - PubMed
  3. Br J Nutr. 2014 Aug 28;112(4):627-37 - PubMed
  4. Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Oct;25(5):1023-9 - PubMed
  5. Methods Inf Med. 2006;45(4):409-13 - PubMed
  6. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Apr;14(4):694-701 - PubMed
  7. Br J Nutr. 2011 May;105(10):1530-8 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Public Health. 2002 Sep;12 (3):208-13 - PubMed
  9. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
  10. Biom J. 2016 Nov;58(6):1538-1551 - PubMed
  11. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Mar 15;133(6):616-28 - PubMed
  12. J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 5;26(8):420-32 - PubMed
  13. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Sep;40(9):877-86 - PubMed
  14. Food Nutr Res. 2012;56:null - PubMed
  15. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Sep;19(13):2347-56 - PubMed
  16. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Sep;69(9):977-1003 - PubMed
  17. Nutr J. 2010 Sep 15;9:37 - PubMed
  18. Br J Nutr. 2016 Feb 28;115(4):666-71 - PubMed
  19. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Feb 15;153(4):394-403 - PubMed
  20. Public Health Nutr. 2002 Aug;5(4):567-87 - PubMed
  21. Nutrients. 2015 Jul 07;7(7):5484-96 - PubMed
  22. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Feb;30(1):36-50 - PubMed
  23. J Nutr. 1994 Nov;124(11 Suppl):2245S-2317S - PubMed
  24. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Feb 26;31 Suppl 3:91-8 - PubMed
  25. JAMA. 2005 Jan 12;293(2):233-4 - PubMed
  26. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;60(3):408-15 - PubMed
  27. Nutrients. 2016 May 07;8(5): - PubMed
  28. BMC Cancer. 2017 Jan 30;17 (1):83 - PubMed
  29. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008 Dec;12(10):735-41 - PubMed
  30. Int J Obes Suppl. 2015 Dec;5(Suppl 2):S22-8 - PubMed
  31. Nutr J. 2012 Mar 13;11:12 - PubMed
  32. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Apr;15(4):618-26 - PubMed
  33. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2004;13(4):318-23 - PubMed

Publication Types