Display options
Share it on

Obstet Gynecol Int. 2018 Feb 01;2018:6901764. doi: 10.1155/2018/6901764. eCollection 2018.

Laparoscopic Management of Adhesions Developed after Peritoneal Nonclosure in Primary Cesarean Section Delivery.

Obstetrics and gynecology international

Emaduldin Seyam, Emad Moussa Ibrahim, Ayman Moheb Youseff, Eissa M Khalifa, Enas Hefzy

Affiliations

  1. Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Minia University College of Medicine, Minya, Egypt.
  2. Microbiology and Immunology Department, Fayoum University College of Medicine, Faiyum, Egypt.

PMID: 29487625 PMCID: PMC5816863 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6901764

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to laparoscopically investigate the effects of peritoneal nonclosure on the sites, types, and degrees of adhesions developed after primary caesarean section (CS) in women complaining of secondary infertility after first CS delivery.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study, where 250 women suffering from secondary infertility after their first CS had been recruited. They had been classified into group I (

RESULTS: Both adnexal and nonadnexal adhesions had been found significantly higher in group I, while adnexal types of adhesions were significantly higher after nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum in group II. Laparoscopic tubal surgery performed included tubo-ovariolysis, fimbrioplasty, and neosalpingostomy. Pregnancy rate was found correlating with the adnexal adhesion location and score.

CONCLUSION: Nonclosure of the peritoneum in CS is associated with more adhesion formation, which might adversely affect the future women reproduction.

References

  1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Nov;147(1):3-8 - PubMed
  2. Dig Surg. 2001;18(4):260-73 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Feb 10;101(1):31-5 - PubMed
  4. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Aug;94(2):103-7 - PubMed
  5. J Reprod Infertil. 2016 Apr-Jun;17(2):104-9 - PubMed
  6. Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5 Suppl):S144-9 - PubMed
  7. Womens Health (Lond). 2013 Sep;9(5):467-77 - PubMed
  8. BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):694-8 - PubMed
  9. Fertil Steril. 2002 Aug;78(2):424-5 - PubMed
  10. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;77(6):818-21 - PubMed
  11. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Sep;87(9):1007-11 - PubMed
  12. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):275-80 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 May 1;108(1):40-4 - PubMed
  14. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Feb;27(2):159-60 - PubMed
  15. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2015 Jan-Mar;27(1):78-80 - PubMed
  16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;201(1):56.e1-6 - PubMed
  17. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Aug;32(4):396-402 - PubMed
  18. BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):276-83 - PubMed
  19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6 Suppl):S19-24 - PubMed
  20. J Reprod Med. 2005 Sep;50(9):659-62 - PubMed
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD000163 - PubMed
  22. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004662 - PubMed
  23. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Sep-Oct;128(1-2):267-9 - PubMed
  24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e31-2 - PubMed
  25. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(3):162-8 - PubMed
  26. BJOG. 2010 Oct;117(11):1366-76 - PubMed
  27. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005 Oct;33(10):745-9 - PubMed
  28. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 11;(8):CD000163 - PubMed
  29. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Mar;(35):1-8 - PubMed
  30. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Oct 22;7:24 - PubMed
  31. Hum Reprod. 2004 Aug;19(8):1877-85 - PubMed
  32. Fertil Steril. 1988 Jun;49(6):944-55 - PubMed
  33. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;189(2):609-12 - PubMed
  34. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jun;32(6):598-602 - PubMed
  35. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):461.e1-6 - PubMed

Publication Types