Display options
Share it on

J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 01;17(8):e883-e889. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000481.

Qualitative Content Analysis of Coworkers' Safety Reports of Unprofessional Behavior by Physicians and Advanced Practice Professionals.

Journal of patient safety

William Martinez, James W Pichert, Gerald B Hickson, Casey H Braddy, Amy J Brown, Thomas F Catron, Ilene N Moore, Morgan R Stampfle, Lynn E Webb, William O Cooper

Affiliations

  1. From the Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health.
  2. Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy.
  3. Quality, Safety, and Risk Prevention.
  4. Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

PMID: 29547475 DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000481

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to develop a valid and reliable taxonomy of coworker reports of alleged unprofessional behavior by physicians and advanced practice professionals and determine the prevalence of reports describing particular types of unprofessional conduct.

METHODS: We conducted qualitative content analysis of coworker reports of alleged unprofessional behavior by physicians and advanced practice professionals to create a standardized taxonomy. We conducted a focus group of experts in medical professionalism to assess the taxonomy's face validity. We randomly selected 120 reports (20%) of the 590 total reports submitted through the medical center's safety event reporting system between June 2015 and September 2016 to measure interrater reliability of taxonomy codes and estimate the prevalence of reports describing particular types of conduct.

RESULTS: The initial taxonomy contained 22 codes organized into the following four domains: competent medical care, clear and respectful communication, integrity, and responsibility. All 10 experts agreed that the four domains reflected essential elements of medical professionalism. Interrater reliabilities for all codes and domains had a κ value greater than the 0.60 threshold for good reliability. Most reports (60%, 95% confidence interval = 51%-69%) described disrespectful or offensive communication. Nine codes had a prevalence of less than 1% and were folded into their respective domains resulting in a final taxonomy composed of 13 codes.

CONCLUSIONS: The final taxonomy represents a useful tool with demonstrated validity and reliability, opening the door for reliable analysis and systems to promote accountability and behavior change. Given the safety implications of unprofessional behavior, understanding the typology of coworker observations of unprofessional behavior may inform organization strategies to address this threat to patient safety.

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Riskin A, Erez A, Foulk TA, et al. The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2015;136:487–495. - PubMed
  2. Cooper WO, Guillamondegui O, Hines OJ, et al. Use of unsolicited patient observations to identify surgeons with increased risk for postoperative complications. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:522–529. - PubMed
  3. Pichert JW, Hickson GB, Moore IN. Using patient complaints to promote patient safety: the Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS). In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) ed. Bethesda, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008:421–430. - PubMed
  4. Hickson GB, Pichert JW, Webb LE, et al. A complementary approach to promoting professionalism: identifying, measuring, and addressing unprofessional behaviors. Acad Med. 2007;82:1040–1048. - PubMed
  5. Schaffner W, Ray WA, Federspiel CF, et al. Improving antibiotic prescribing in office practice. A controlled trial of three educational methods. JAMA. 1983;250:1728–1732. - PubMed
  6. Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach (‘academic detailing’) to improve clinical decision making. JAMA. 1990;263:549–556. - PubMed
  7. Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians’ practices. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1271–1273. - PubMed
  8. Webb LE, Dmochowski RR, Moore IN, et al. Using coworker observations to promote accountability for disrespectful and unsafe behaviors by physicians and advanced practice professionals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016;42:149–164. - PubMed
  9. Hickson GB, Federspiel CF, Pichert JW, et al. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2002;287:2951–2957. - PubMed
  10. Pichert JW, Moore IN, Karrass J, et al. An intervention model that promotes accountability: peer messengers and patient/family complaints. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013;39:435–446. - PubMed
  11. Harrison R, Walton M, Healy J, et al. Patient complaints about hospital services: applying a complaint taxonomy to analyse and respond to complaints. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28:240–245. - PubMed
  12. Reader TW, Gillespie A, Roberts J. Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:678–689. - PubMed
  13. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Credo Commitment Letter Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/6vYwoDt86. Accessed December 8, 2017. - PubMed
  14. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Credo Poster Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/6vXTsN0Vm. Accessed December 7, 2017. - PubMed
  15. Govern P. Professional conduct standards take shape. Reporter - Vanderbilt University Medical Center’s Weekly Newspaper 2005 8, 2005. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/6vYy33VZi. Accessed December 8, 2017. - PubMed
  16. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, Inc; 2013. - PubMed
  17. ABIM Foundation; ACP-ASIM Foundation; and European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:243–246. - PubMed
  18. Dupree E, Anderson R, McEvoy MD, et al. Professionalism: a necessary ingredient in a culture of safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37:447–455. - PubMed
  19. Pichert JW, Moore IN, Hickson GB. Professionals promoting professionalism. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011;37:446. - PubMed
  20. Martinez W, Pichert JW, Hickson GB, et al. Programs for promoting professionalism: questions to guide next steps. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40:159–160. - PubMed
  21. Leape LL, Shore MF, Dienstag JL, et al. Perspective: a culture of respect, part 1: the nature and causes of disrespectful behavior by physicians. Acad Med. 2012;87:845–852. - PubMed
  22. Leape LL, Shore MF, Dienstag JL, et al. Perspective: a culture of respect, part 2: creating a culture of respect. Acad Med. 2012;87:853–858. - PubMed
  23. Reddy ST, Iwaz JA, Didwania AK, et al. Participation in unprofessional behaviors among hospitalists: a multicenter study. J Hosp Med. 2012;7:543–550. - PubMed
  24. Teherani A, Hodgson CS, Banach M, et al. Domains of unprofessional behavior during medical school associated with future disciplinary action by a state medical board. Acad Med. 2005;80:S17–S20. - PubMed
  25. Association of American Medical Colleges and National Board of Medical Examiners. Embedding Professionalism in Medical Education: Assessment as Tool for Implementation. 2002. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/6vi7CgYOC. Accessed December 14, 2017. - PubMed
  26. Glaser B, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967. - PubMed
  27. Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25:1229–1245. - PubMed
  28. Montini T, Noble AA, Stelfox HT. Content analysis of patient complaints. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20:412–420. - PubMed
  29. Kirk J, Miller ML. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1986. - PubMed
  30. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30:607–610. - PubMed
  31. Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85:257–268. - PubMed
  32. Gwet K. Inter-rater reliability: dependency on trait prevalence and marginal homogeneity. Statistical Methods for Inter-Rater Reliability Assessment Series. 2002;2:1–9. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/6xcsCvVhd. Accessed March 2, 2018. - PubMed
  33. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, et al. The electronic patient record in primary care—regression or progression? A cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;326:1439–1443. - PubMed
  34. Loewen S, Plonsky L. An A–Z of Applied Linguistics Research Methods. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. - PubMed
  35. Rosenstein AH, O’daniel M. Disruptive behavior & clinical outcomes: perceptions of nurses & physicians: nurses, physicians, and administrators say that clinicians’ disruptive behavior has negative effects on clinical outcomes. Nurs Manage. 2005;36:18–28. - PubMed
  36. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Eacker A, et al. Race, ethnicity, and medical student well-being in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:2103–2109. - PubMed
  37. Rawson JV, Thompson N, Sostre G, et al. The cost of disruptive and unprofessional behaviors in health care. Acad Radiol. 2013;20:1074–1076. - PubMed
  38. Hines S, Luna K, Lofthus J, et al. Becoming a high reliability organization: operational advice for hospital leaders. AHRQ publication. 2008 (08–0022). - PubMed
  39. Damberg CL, Sorbero ME, Lovejoy SL, et al. Measuring success in health care value-based purchasing programs. Rand Health Q. 2014;4:9. - PubMed
  40. Hospital value-based purchasing. Online information; 2014. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital Value-based Purchasing. 2017. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/6xcsutFyY. Accessed March 2, 2018. - PubMed
  41. Leape LL, Fromson JA. Problem doctors: is there a system-level solution? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:107–115. - PubMed
  42. Rosenstein AH, O’Daniel M. A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:464–471. - PubMed
  43. Martinez W, Lehmann LS, Thomas EJ, et al. Speaking up about traditional and professionalism-related patient safety threats: a national survey of interns and residents. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:869–880. - PubMed
  44. Waring JJ. Beyond blame: cultural barriers to medical incident reporting. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1927–1935. - PubMed
  45. Martinez W, Etchegaray JM, Thomas EJ, et al. ‘Speaking up’ about patient safety concerns and unprofessional behaviour among residents: validation of two scales. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:671–680. - PubMed
  46. Etchegaray JM, Thomas EJ. Comparing two safety culture surveys: safety attitudes questionnaire and hospital survey on patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:490–498. - PubMed
  47. Kohanim S, Sternberg P Jr, Karrass J, et al. Unsolicited patient complaints in ophthalmology: an empirical analysis from a large national database. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:234–241. - PubMed
  48. Stimson C, Karrass J, Dmochowski RR, et al. Academic urologic surgeons have greater exposure to risk management activity compared to community urologic surgeons: an empirical analysis of patient complaint data. Urol Pract. 2016. - PubMed

Publication Types