Display options
Share it on

Infect Dis Ther. 2018 Mar;7:27-34. doi: 10.1007/s40121-018-0191-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

Yeast Biofilm as a Bridge Between Medical and Environmental Microbiology Across Different Detection Techniques.

Infectious diseases and therapy

Luca Roscini, Alice Vassiliou, Laura Corte, Debora Casagrande Pierantoni, Vincent Robert, Carlo Tascini, Sara Mattana, Martina Alunni Cardinali, Stylianos E Orfanos, Daniele Fioretto, Gianluigi Cardinali

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  2. First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos Hospital, Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  3. Westerdijk Institute of Fungal Diversity, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  4. First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, Naples, Italy.
  5. Department of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  6. Second Department of Critical Care, Attikon Hospital, Medical School of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
  7. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. [email protected].
  8. CEMIN-Excellence Research Center, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. [email protected].

PMID: 29549654 PMCID: PMC5856731 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-018-0191-4

Abstract

Medical and environmental microbiology have two distinct, although very short, histories stemming, the first from the pioneering works of Sommelweiss, Pasteur, Lister and Koch, the second mainly from the studies of Bejerink and Winogradsky. These two branches of microbiology evolved and specialized separately producing distinct communities and evolving rather different approaches and techniques. The evidence accumulated in recent decades indicate that indeed most of the medically relevant microorganisms have a short circulation within the nosocomial environment and a larger one involving the external, i.e. non-nosocomial, and the hospital environments. This evidence suggests that the differences between approaches should yield to a convergent approach aimed at solving the increasing problem represented by infectious diseases for the increasingly less resistant human communities. Microbial biofilm is one of the major systems used by these microbes to resist the harsh conditions of the natural and anthropic environment, and the even worse ones related to medical settings. This paper presents a brief outline of the converging interest of both environmental and medical microbiology toward a better understanding of microbial biofilm and of the various innovative techniques that can be employed to characterize, in a timely and quantitative manner, these complex structures. Among these, micro-Raman along with micro-Brillouin offer high hopes of describing biofilms both at the subcellular and supercellular level, with the possibility of characterizing the various landscapes of the different biofilms. The possibility of adding a taxonomic identification of the cells comprising the biofilm is a complex aspect presenting several technical issues that will require further studies in the years to come.

Keywords: Biofilm; Candida; Environmental microbiology; Medical microbiology; Micro-Brillouin; Micro-Raman; Yeasts

References

  1. Food Microbiol. 2015 Jun;48:206-15 - PubMed
  2. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996 Oct;9(4):499-511 - PubMed
  3. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Oct 15;39(8):1182-9 - PubMed
  4. Microorganisms. 2015 Aug 19;3(3):428-40 - PubMed
  5. Mycopathologia. 2010 Mar;169(3):207-13 - PubMed
  6. J Mycol Med. 2015 Dec;25(4):280-6 - PubMed
  7. Biophys Chem. 2017 Oct;229:123-129 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Aug;47(8):2392-7 - PubMed
  9. Infect Immun. 2003 Aug;71(8):4333-40 - PubMed
  10. Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 01;6:26860 - PubMed
  11. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017 Sep 8;3:20 - PubMed
  12. BMC Microbiol. 2011 Aug 08;11:180 - PubMed
  13. Med Mycol. 2005 Jun;43(4):285-318 - PubMed
  14. Int J Environ Health Res. 2007 Jun;17(3):197-206 - PubMed
  15. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Jan;22(1):87-93 - PubMed
  16. Mycoses. 2015 Jun;58 Suppl 2:2-13 - PubMed
  17. Food Microbiol. 2010 May;27(3):381-9 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Aug;20(8):535-43 - PubMed
  19. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Jul;34(3):221-7 - PubMed
  20. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2017 Nov;10 (6):null - PubMed
  21. Biophys Chem. 2016 Jan;208:48-53 - PubMed
  22. BMC Microbiol. 2014 Jul 05;14:182 - PubMed
  23. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(5):1433-43 - PubMed
  24. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 15;64(2):134-140 - PubMed
  25. J Biophotonics. 2016 Jul;9(7):694-700 - PubMed
  26. Anal Chem. 2015 Aug 4;87(15):7519-23 - PubMed
  27. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012 Mar;36(2):288-305 - PubMed
  28. Nat Microbiol. 2017 Jul 25;2:17120 - PubMed
  29. Anaerobe. 2011 Dec;17(6):288-91 - PubMed
  30. Analyst. 2014 Feb 21;139(4):729-33 - PubMed
  31. J Prev Med Hyg. 2006 Sep;47(3):119-26 - PubMed
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 3;109(1):28-32 - PubMed
  33. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;92(3):549-55 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support