Display options
Cite
Rathod KS, Hamshere SM, Jones DA, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging - Apples and Oranges?. Interv Cardiol. 2015;10(1):8-15doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8.
Rathod, K. S., Hamshere, S. M., Jones, D. A., & Mathur, A. (2015). Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging - Apples and Oranges?. Interventional cardiology (London, England), 10(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8
Rathod, Krishnaraj S, et al. "Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging - Apples and Oranges?." Interventional cardiology (London, England) vol. 10,1 (2015): 8-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8
Rathod KS, Hamshere SM, Jones DA, Mathur A. Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging - Apples and Oranges?. Interv Cardiol. 2015 Mar;10(1):8-15. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8. PMID: 29588667; PMCID: PMC5808463.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Interv Cardiol. 2015 Mar;10(1):8-15. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8.

Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging - Apples and Oranges?.

Interventional cardiology (London, England)

Krishnaraj S Rathod, Stephen M Hamshere, Daniel A Jones, Anthony Mathur

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Barts Health NHS Trust.
  2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University.
  3. NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, London Chest Hospital, London, UK.

PMID: 29588667 PMCID: PMC5808463 DOI: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8

Abstract

Intravascular imaging has advanced our understanding of coronary artery disease and facilitated decision-making in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In particular, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has contributed significantly to modern PCI techniques. The recent introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has further expanded this field due to its higher resolution and rapid image acquisition as compared with IVUS. Furthermore, OCT allows detailed planning of interventional strategies and optimisation before stent deployment, particularly with complex lesions. However, to date it is unclear whether OCT is superior to IVUS as an intracoronary imaging modality with limited data supporting OCT use in routine clinical practice. This review aims to compare these two intracoronary imaging techniques and the recent evidence for their use in this ever-changing field within interventional cardiology.

Keywords: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS); intracoronary imaging; optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Circulation. 2002 Oct 22;106(17 ):2200-6 - PubMed
  2. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996 Jul;38(3):238-41 - PubMed
  3. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb;27(2):215-24 - PubMed
  4. J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Oct;14 (5):676-86 - PubMed
  5. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1478-92 - PubMed
  6. Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(11):1348-55 - PubMed
  7. Eur Heart J. 2008 Aug;29(15):1851-7 - PubMed
  8. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007 Jul;27(7):1500-10 - PubMed
  9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Feb 20;39(4):604-9 - PubMed
  10. Circulation. 2003 Jan 7;107(1):113-9 - PubMed
  11. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):78-85 - PubMed
  12. Lancet. 2009 Mar 14;373(9667):897-910 - PubMed
  13. Circulation. 1990 May;81(5):1575-85 - PubMed
  14. Circulation. 2001 Jan 30;103(4):604-16 - PubMed
  15. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(3):551-7 - PubMed
  16. EuroIntervention. 2015 Dec;11(8):895-904 - PubMed
  17. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr;5(2):193-201 - PubMed
  18. Circ J. 2008 Sep;72(9):1536-7 - PubMed
  19. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Nov;22(11):541-5 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 1992 Jul;86(1):154-8 - PubMed
  21. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(9):1022-39 - PubMed
  22. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e44-122 - PubMed
  23. Nat Med. 2006 Dec;12(12):1429-33 - PubMed
  24. Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(20):2501-55 - PubMed
  25. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;6(10 ):1095-1104 - PubMed
  26. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Jul;16(1):145-54 - PubMed
  27. Circulation. 2005 Mar 29;111(12):1551-5 - PubMed
  28. Am Heart J. 2009 Aug;158(2):284-93 - PubMed
  29. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Oct;18(4):952-8 - PubMed
  30. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 1;101(5):562-7 - PubMed
  31. Circulation. 2002 May 28;105(21):2487-92 - PubMed
  32. EuroIntervention. 2007 May;3(1):113-20 - PubMed
  33. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Oct;14(4):947-52 - PubMed
  34. Eur Heart J. 2007 Apr;28(8):961-7 - PubMed
  35. J Cardiol. 2008 Dec;52(3):290-5 - PubMed
  36. EuroIntervention. 2010 Nov;6(5):575-81 - PubMed
  37. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jan 1;77(1):15-21 - PubMed
  38. Eur Heart J. 2010 Jan;31(2):165-76 - PubMed
  39. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):578-83 - PubMed
  40. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 21;45(12 ):1946-53 - PubMed
  41. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014 May;16(5):304 - PubMed
  42. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):741-50 - PubMed
  43. Circ J. 2012;76(3):698-703 - PubMed
  44. Heart. 2003 Mar;89(3):317-20 - PubMed
  45. Circulation. 2002 Sep 24;106(13):1640-5 - PubMed
  46. Korean J Intern Med. 2012 Mar;27(1):1-12 - PubMed
  47. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 20;364(3):226-35 - PubMed
  48. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 15;97(12):1713-7 - PubMed
  49. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Aug;4(8):894-901 - PubMed
  50. Eur Heart J. 2010 Feb;31(4):401-15 - PubMed
  51. Am Heart J. 2014 Aug;168(2):175-81.e1-2 - PubMed
  52. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013 Sep;43(9):996-1008 - PubMed
  53. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1479-85 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support