Display options
Share it on

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1070. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1070. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

Type B adverse drug reactions reported by an immunoallergology department.

Pharmacy practice

Maria J Costa, Maria T Herdeiro, Jorge J Polónia, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Cármen Botelho, Eunice Castro, Josefina Cernadas

Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto (Portugal). [email protected].
  2. Institute for Research in Biomedicine - iBiMED, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro. Aveiro (Portugal). [email protected].
  3. Porto Pharmacovigilance Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto (Portugal). [email protected].
  4. Center for Health Technology and Services Research; & Porto Pharmacovigilance Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto (Portugal). [email protected].
  5. Immunoallergology Department, Hospital São João. Porto (Portugal). [email protected].
  6. Immunoallergology Department, Hospital São João. Porto (Portugal). [email protected].
  7. Immunoallergology Department, Hospital São João. Porto (Portugal). [email protected].

PMID: 29619134 PMCID: PMC5881478 DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1070

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Characterization of the adverse drug reactions (ADR) reported by the immunoallergology department (IAD), Centro Hospitalar de São João (Porto), to the Northern Pharmacovigilance Centre (NPC).

METHODS: An observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted, based in a spontaneous report system. Participants were all the patients from the IAD, with suspected ADR, reported to NPC by specialists after the study was completed.

RESULTS: Studied population had a median age of 41 years, with the predominance of the female gender (73.2%). Allergic rhinitis and asthma were the most frequent comorbidities. All studied ADR were type B, 89.6% were serious, 86.4% unexpected and 2.6% associated with drugs that presented less than 2 years in the market. The most represented drug classes were the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (52.6%) and antibiotics (25.2%). Skin symptoms represented 61.2% of the reported complaints. About 52.9% of these ADR occurred in less than one hour after intake. The most frequent ADR treatment at the time of the reaction was drug interruption (86.2%), followed by the prescription of anti-histamines (42.2%).

CONCLUSIONS: Reported ADR to NPC by the Drug Alert Unit were mainly serious, unexpected, associated with NSAIDs and antibiotics and related with marketing authorization medicines older than two years. These results could be very useful to develop strategies to prevent the clinical and economic consequences of ADR.

Keywords: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Inpatients; Non-Steroidal; Portugal

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST None.

References

  1. Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;42(7):1017-25 - PubMed
  2. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4439 - PubMed
  3. J R Soc Med. 2010 Jun;103(6):239-50 - PubMed
  4. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;125(2 Suppl 2):S126-37 - PubMed
  5. Allergy. 2009 Feb;64(2):194-203 - PubMed
  6. Allergy. 2001 Sep;56(9):813-24 - PubMed
  7. Eur J Intern Med. 2008 Nov;19(7):505-10 - PubMed
  8. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jan;46(1):63 - PubMed
  9. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Jun;18(6):427-36 - PubMed
  10. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):449-59 - PubMed
  11. Curr Drug Metab. 2009 Nov;10(9):971-80 - PubMed
  12. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 25;10(9):e0139097 - PubMed
  13. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Jan;39(1):43-61 - PubMed
  14. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(12):1805-13 - PubMed
  15. Drug Saf. 2015 May;38(5):437-53 - PubMed
  16. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Jan;38(1):191-8 - PubMed
  17. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002 Mar;11(2):159-63 - PubMed
  18. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;71(5):684-700 - PubMed
  19. Allergy. 2014 Apr;69(4):420-37 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000 Oct;25(5):355-61 - PubMed
  21. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Jun;105(6 Pt 2):S637-44 - PubMed
  22. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Apr;65(4):573-9 - PubMed
  23. BMJ. 2004 Jul 3;329(7456):15-9 - PubMed
  24. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2012 Jun;34(3):530-3 - PubMed
  25. Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Oct;74(10):639-44 - PubMed
  26. Allergy. 2008 May;63(5):616-9 - PubMed
  27. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(10):1009-11 - PubMed
  28. JAMA. 1998 Apr 15;279(15):1200-5 - PubMed
  29. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Sep 25;7:9 - PubMed
  30. Pharm World Sci. 2008 Dec;30(6):854-62 - PubMed
  31. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3 Suppl):S67-73 - PubMed
  32. Pharm World Sci. 2002 Apr;24(2):46-54 - PubMed
  33. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Oct;34(10):1597-601 - PubMed
  34. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Sep;17(9):919-25 - PubMed
  35. Lancet. 2000 Oct 7;356(9237):1255-9 - PubMed
  36. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;49(2):158-67 - PubMed

Publication Types