Display options
Share it on

J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Feb;10(1):25-31. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.25. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

Metal-ceramic bond strength between a feldspathic porcelain and a Co-Cr alloy fabricated with Direct Metal Laser Sintering technique.

The journal of advanced prosthodontics

Konstantinos Dimitriadis, Konstantinos Spyropoulos, Triantafillos Papadopoulos

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomaterials, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
  2. Department of Dental Technology, Technological Institute of Athens, Greece.

PMID: 29503711 PMCID: PMC5829284 DOI: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.25

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to record the metal-ceramic bond strength of a feldspathic dental porcelain and a Co-Cr alloy, using the Direct Metal Laser Sintering technique (DMLS) for the fabrication of metal substrates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten metal substrates were fabricated with powder of a dental Co-Cr alloy using DMLS technique (test group) in dimensions according to ISO 9693. Another ten substrates were fabricated with a casing dental Co-Cr alloy using classic casting technique (control group) for comparison. Another three substrates were fabricated using each technique to record the Modulus of Elasticity (

RESULTS: Substrates prepared using DMLS technique did not show internal porosity as compared to those produced using the casting technique. The E of control and test group was 222 ± 5.13 GPa and 227 ± 3 GPa, respectively. The bond strength was 51.87 ± 7.50 MPa for test group and 54.60 ± 6.20 MPa for control group. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were recorded. The mode of failure was mainly cohesive for all specimens.

CONCLUSION: Specimens produced by the DMLS technique cover the lowest acceptable metal-ceramic bond strength of 25 MPa specified in ISO 9693 and present satisfactory bond strength for clinical use.

Keywords: Co-Cr dental alloy; Direct Metal Laser Sintering (DMLS); Metal-ceramic bond strength; Three-point bending test

References

  1. Dent Mater. 1995 Mar;11(2):147-51 - PubMed
  2. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Sep;68(3):462-7 - PubMed
  3. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Apr;6(2):138-45 - PubMed
  4. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Nov;80(5):570-4 - PubMed
  5. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Aug;7(4):312-6 - PubMed
  6. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014 Feb 1;35:231-8 - PubMed
  7. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;48(3):170-2 - PubMed
  8. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Aug;6(4):266-71 - PubMed
  9. Dent Mater. 2008 Oct;24(10):1400-4 - PubMed
  10. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Aug;12:83-92 - PubMed
  11. J Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;24(4):303-12 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996 Jun;104(3):313-9 - PubMed
  13. Dent Mater. 2014 Apr;30(4):e79-88 - PubMed
  14. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):453-7 - PubMed
  15. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):51-5 - PubMed
  16. Risk Anal. 2002 Oct;22(5):1019-33 - PubMed
  17. Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):3-12 - PubMed
  18. J Int Oral Health. 2014 Sep;6(5):99-103 - PubMed
  19. J Dent Res. 1990 Dec;69(12):1791-9 - PubMed
  20. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Apr;32(2):115-8 - PubMed
  21. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 May;21:67-76 - PubMed

Publication Types