Display options
Cite
Su X, McCardle KM, Panetier JA, et al. Electrocatalytic CO. Chem Commun (Camb). 2018;54(27):3351-3354doi: 10.1039/c8cc00266e.
Su, X., McCardle, K. M., Panetier, J. A., & Jurss, J. W. (2018). Electrocatalytic CO. Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 54(27), 3351-3354. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cc00266e
Su, Xiaojun, et al. "Electrocatalytic CO." Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) vol. 54,27 (2018): 3351-3354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cc00266e
Su X, McCardle KM, Panetier JA, Jurss JW. Electrocatalytic CO. Chem Commun (Camb). 2018 Mar 29;54(27):3351-3354. doi: 10.1039/c8cc00266e. PMID: 29504619.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Chem Commun (Camb). 2018 Mar 29;54(27):3351-3354. doi: 10.1039/c8cc00266e.

Electrocatalytic CO.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)

Xiaojun Su, Kaitlin M McCardle, Julien A Panetier, Jonah W Jurss

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 29504619 DOI: 10.1039/c8cc00266e

Abstract

A series of nickel complexes featuring redox-active macrocycles is reported for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. A remarkable structure-activity relationship is elucidated from the series through electrochemical studies and DFT calculations, wherein a fine electronic balance between metal and ligand redox chemistry dictates selectivity for CO2 reduction versus the competing proton reduction reaction.

Publication Types