Display options
Share it on

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 14;15(3). doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030512.

Focus on Chronic Exposure for Deriving Drinking Water Guidance Underestimates Potential Risk to Infants.

International journal of environmental research and public health

Helen Goeden

Affiliations

  1. Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55164-0975, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 29538282 PMCID: PMC5877057 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15030512

Abstract

In 2007, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) developed new risk assessment methods for deriving human health-based water guidance (HBG) that incorporated the assessment of multiple exposure durations and life stages. The methodology is based on US Environmental Protection Agency recommendations for protecting children's health (US EPA 2002). Over the last 10 years, the MDH has derived multiple duration (e.g., short-term, subchronic, and chronic) water guidance for over 60 chemicals. This effort involved derivation of multiple duration reference doses (RfDs) and selection of corresponding water intake rates (e.g., infant, child, and lifetime). As expected, RfDs typically decreased with increasing exposure duration. However, the corresponding HBG frequently did not decrease with increasing duration. For more than half of the chemicals, the shorter duration HBG was lower than chronic HBG value. Conventional wisdom has been that chronic-based values will be the most conservative and will therefore be protective of less than chronic exposures. However, the MDH's experience highlights the importance of evaluating short-term exposures. For many chemicals, elevated intake rates early in life, coupled with short-term RfDs, resulted in the lowest HBG. Drinking water criteria based on chronic assessments may not be protective of short-term exposures in highly exposed populations such as formula-fed infants.

Keywords: chemical risk assessment; drinking water guidance; duration extrapolation; infant exposure

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Toxicol Lett. 2011 Aug 28;205(2):122-9 - PubMed
  2. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;61(2):243-50 - PubMed
  3. Toxicol Lett. 2009 Oct 8;190(1):16-22 - PubMed
  4. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1998 Apr;27(2):108-11 - PubMed
  5. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Jun;23(3):249-55 - PubMed
  6. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Jun;69(1):113-24 - PubMed
  7. Toxicol Sci. 2005 Jun;85(2):1033-40 - PubMed

Substances

MeSH terms

Publication Types