Display options
Share it on

Oncotarget. 2018 Feb 14;9(17):13870-13883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24493. eCollection 2018 Mar 02.

A single digital droplet PCR assay to detect multiple .

Oncotarget

Pieter A Boonstra, Arja Ter Elst, Marco Tibbesma, Lisette J Bosman, Ron Mathijssen, Florence Atrafi, Frits van Coevorden, Neeltje Steeghs, Sheima Farag, Hans Gelderblom, Winette T A van der Graaf, Ingrid M E Desar, Jacqueline Maier, Jelle Overbosch, Albert J H Suurmeijer, Jourik Gietema, Ed Schuuring, Anna K L Reyners

Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.
  2. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.
  3. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands.
  4. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
  5. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
  6. Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
  7. Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
  8. University of Leipzig, Center for Internal Medicine, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
  9. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiology, Groningen 9713 GZ, The Netherlands.

PMID: 29568401 PMCID: PMC5862622 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24493

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are characterized by oncogenic

METHODS: A ddPCR assay was designed using two probes that cover both hotspots. Available archival FFPE tumor tissue from 27 consecutive patients with known KIT exon 11 mutations and 9 randomly selected patients without exon 11 mutations were tested. Plasma samples were prospectively collected in a multicenter bio-databank from December 2014. ctDNA was analyzed of 22 patients with an exon 11 mutation and a baseline plasma sample.

RESULTS: The ddPCR assay detected the exon 11 mutation in 21 of 22 tumors with exon 11 mutations covered by the assay. Mutations in ctDNA were detected at baseline in 13 of 14 metastasized patients, but in only 1 of 8 patients with localized disease. In serial plasma samples from 11 patients with metastasized GIST, a decrease in mutant droplets was detected during treatment. According to RECIST 1.1, 10 patients had radiological treatment response and one patient stable disease.

CONCLUSION: A single ddPCR assay for the detection of multiple exon 11 mutations in ctDNA is a feasible, promising tool for monitoring treatment response in patients with metastasized GIST and should be further evaluated in a larger cohort.

Keywords: GIST; cell-free circulating DNA; digital droplet PCR; plasma; single assay

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D805-11 - PubMed
  2. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 1;11(11):4182-90 - PubMed
  3. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;2(8):1014-22 - PubMed
  4. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24 - PubMed
  5. Mol Diagn Ther. 2016 Aug;20(4):347-51 - PubMed
  6. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(6):426-37 - PubMed
  7. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Aug 26;7(302):302ra133 - PubMed
  8. Nat Med. 2008 Sep;14(9):985-90 - PubMed
  9. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145754 - PubMed
  10. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008 Aug;29 Suppl 1:S49-52 - PubMed
  11. Target Oncol. 2015 Dec;10 (4):597-601 - PubMed
  12. Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 12;6:20913 - PubMed
  13. Anal Chem. 2011 Nov 15;83(22):8604-10 - PubMed
  14. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):634-42 - PubMed
  15. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 1;15(3):1032-8 - PubMed
  16. N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 15;347(7):472-80 - PubMed
  17. Science. 2003 Jan 31;299(5607):708-10 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 20;32(6):579-86 - PubMed
  19. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 1;23 (3):618-622 - PubMed
  20. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 15;21(14):3196-203 - PubMed
  21. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3375-82 - PubMed
  22. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 05;11(4):e0153065 - PubMed
  23. Mol Cancer Res. 2016 Oct;14 (10 ):898-908 - PubMed
  24. BMC Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;16:22 - PubMed
  25. Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):295-302 - PubMed
  26. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Mar 15;20(6):1698-1705 - PubMed
  27. Ann Oncol. 2014 Nov;25(11):2272-7 - PubMed
  28. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e70346 - PubMed
  29. Science. 1998 Jan 23;279(5350):577-80 - PubMed
  30. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 Oct;130(10):1466-78 - PubMed
  31. JAMA Oncol. 2015 May;1(2):149-57 - PubMed
  32. Mol Oncol. 2014 Sep 12;8(6):1095-111 - PubMed
  33. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 1;19(17):4854-67 - PubMed
  34. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12 ):3067-77 - PubMed
  35. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;12(6):1743-9 - PubMed
  36. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1247-53 - PubMed
  37. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;10(8):472-84 - PubMed
  38. BMC Cancer. 2014 Jan 10;14 :13 - PubMed
  39. Oncology. 2016;90(2):112-7 - PubMed
  40. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Apr 01;17 (4):484 - PubMed
  41. Cancer. 2005 Feb 15;103(4):821-9 - PubMed
  42. Nature. 2012 Jun 28;486(7404):532-6 - PubMed
  43. Sci Rep. 2015 Jun 22;5:11198 - PubMed
  44. Clin Biochem. 2013 Oct;46(15):1561-5 - PubMed
  45. Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1329-38 - PubMed
  46. J Transl Med. 2011 May 23;9:75 - PubMed
  47. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Oct;10(10):1437-43 - PubMed
  48. Lung Cancer. 2016 Aug;98 :29-32 - PubMed
  49. PLoS One. 2007 Jun 20;2(6):e537 - PubMed
  50. Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 09;5:13718 - PubMed
  51. Annu Rev Pathol. 2008;3:557-86 - PubMed
  52. Nat Methods. 2006 Jul;3(7):551-9 - PubMed
  53. Clin Biochem. 2015 Oct;48(15):948-56 - PubMed
  54. Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):795-801 - PubMed

Publication Types