Display options
Share it on

Materials (Basel). 2018 Apr 06;11(4). doi: 10.3390/ma11040564.

Load-Bearing Capacity and Retention of Newly Developed Micro-Locking Implant Prosthetic System: An In Vitro Pilot Study.

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)

Jae-Won Choi, Kyung-Hee Choi, Hee-Jin Chae, Sung-Ki Chae, Eun-Bin Bae, Jin-Ju Lee, So-Hyoun Lee, Chang-Mo Jeong, Jung-Bo Huh

Affiliations

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea. [email protected].
  2. Research and Development Institute, Cowellmedi Co., Ltd., Busan 46986, Korea. [email protected].
  3. Research and Development Institute, Samwon Dental Medical Precise Co., Ltd., Yangsan 50603, Korea. [email protected].
  4. Research and Development Institute, Samwon Dental Medical Precise Co., Ltd., Yangsan 50603, Korea. [email protected].
  5. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea. [email protected].
  6. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea. [email protected].
  7. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea. [email protected].
  8. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea. [email protected].
  9. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, BK21 PLUS Project, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan 50612, Korea. [email protected].

PMID: 29642407 PMCID: PMC5951448 DOI: 10.3390/ma11040564

Abstract

The aim of this study was to introduce the newly developed micro-locking implant prosthetic system and to evaluate the resulting its characteristics. To evaluate load-bearing capacity, 25 implants were divided into five groups: external-hexagon connection (EH), internal-octagon connection (IO), internal-hexagon connection (IH), one-body implant (OB), micro-locking implant system (ML). The maximum compressive load was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM) according to the ISO 14801. Retention was evaluated in two experiments: (1) a tensile test of the structure modifications of the components (attachment and implant) and (2) a tensile test after cyclic loading (total 5,000,000 cycles, 100 N, 2 Hz). The load-bearing capacity of the ML group was not significantly different from the other groups (

Keywords: dental implant; load-bearing capacity; micro-locking; prosthesis; retention

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(6):845-53 - PubMed
  2. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):253-62 - PubMed
  3. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Jan;77(1):28-35 - PubMed
  4. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):141-151 - PubMed
  5. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):553-9 - PubMed
  6. J Biomech Eng. 2013 May;135(5):54503 - PubMed
  7. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Mar;109(3):156-64 - PubMed
  8. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Aug;14(4):444-54 - PubMed
  9. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):80-2 - PubMed
  10. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:84-98 - PubMed
  11. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Oct;11(5):458-64 - PubMed
  12. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:43-54 - PubMed
  13. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Apr;8(2):144-9 - PubMed
  14. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Dec;17 (6):1127-33 - PubMed
  15. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):645-9 - PubMed
  16. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Jan;31(1):18-22 - PubMed
  17. Arch Oral Biol. 1991;36(7):535-9 - PubMed
  18. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):388-395 - PubMed
  19. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jul;88(1):89-95 - PubMed
  20. Int J Oral Surg. 1981 Dec;10 (6):387-416 - PubMed
  21. J Prosthodont. 2011 Oct;20(7):510-6 - PubMed
  22. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Dec;78(6):582-91 - PubMed
  23. Implant Dent. 2006 Mar;15(1):24-34 - PubMed
  24. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):136-42 - PubMed
  25. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jan;117(1):8-12 - PubMed
  26. Implant Dent. 2002;11(2):137-43 - PubMed
  27. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31(3):115-20 - PubMed
  28. Aust Dent J. 2008 Dec;53(4):332-9 - PubMed
  29. J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):649-54 - PubMed
  30. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):76-94 - PubMed
  31. J Prosthodont. 2016 Nov 18;:null - PubMed
  32. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12(4):186-94 - PubMed
  33. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Oct;11(5):448-57 - PubMed
  34. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):719-28 - PubMed
  35. Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):127-45 - PubMed
  36. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Sep;12(3):219-34 - PubMed
  37. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):137-41 - PubMed
  38. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):550-6 - PubMed
  39. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar;83(3):344-8 - PubMed
  40. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 May;117(5):628-635 - PubMed
  41. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1276-84 - PubMed
  42. Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Jan;42(1):71-89 - PubMed
  43. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Aug;16(4):486-94 - PubMed

Publication Types