Zdr Varst. 2018 Apr 06;57(2):55-64. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2018-0008. eCollection 2018 Jun.
Early Identification of Patients in Need of Palliative Care in Slovenian General Practice.
Zdravstveno varstvo
Lisette Klok, Yvonne Engels, Carel Veldhoven, Danica Rotar Pavlič
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Regenwulp 19Breda, 4822 RJ, the Netherlands.
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Poljanski nasip 58, 1000Ljubljana, Slovenia.
PMID: 29651316
PMCID: PMC5894459 DOI: 10.2478/sjph-2018-0008
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To help general practitioners (GPs) in early identification of patients with palliative care (PC) needs, this pilot study aimed to determine the potential of the combined original surprise question (SQ1) ('Would I be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?') and the second surprise question (SQ2) ('Would I be surprised if this patient was still alive after 12 months?'). We hypothesized that answering these SQs would trigger them to make a multidimensional care plan.
METHODS: 26 Slovenian GPs, randomized into 4 groups, were invited to write a care plan for each of the four patients described in case vignettes (2 oncologic, 1 organ failure and 1 frailty case). GPs in group 1 were only asked to write a care plan for each patient. GPs in group 2 answered SQ1 and GPs in groups 3 and 4 answered SQ1 and SQ2 before writing the care plan. The type and number of PC aspects mentioned in the respective care plans were quantified into a numeric RADboud ANTicipatory (RADIANT) score.
RESULTS: Mean RADIANT scores in groups 1-4 were 2.2, 3.6, 2.5 and 3.1, respectively. When comparing the different vignettes, vignette B (terminal oncologic patient) scored best (3.6). Mean RADIANT scores in groups 3 and 4 were slightly higher for GPs who would be surprised compared to GPs who would not be surprised if the patient was still alive in 12 months.
CONCLUSION: The combined SQs were considered helpful in the early identification of patients in need of PC in Slovenian general practice.
Keywords: Slovenia; cancer; dementia; frail elderly; general practitioners; organ failure; palliative care; surprise question
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.
References
- Zdr Varst. 2015 Dec 16;55(1):86-95 - PubMed
- CMAJ. 2017 Apr 3;189(13):E484-E493 - PubMed
- BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016 Apr 18;:null - PubMed
- Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Sep;62(602):e625-31 - PubMed
- BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Mar 25;14:42 - PubMed
- Health Syst Transit. 2016 Jun;18(3):1-207 - PubMed
- BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Mar;7(1):32-38 - PubMed
- BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Nov 03;12:123 - PubMed
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 06;(6):CD007760 - PubMed
- Palliat Med. 2005 Mar;19(2):111-8 - PubMed
- Zdr Varst. 2015 Dec 16;55(1):78-85 - PubMed
- BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Sep 22;16:126 - PubMed
- Fam Pract. 2003 Feb;20(1):58-60 - PubMed
- Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;28(6):480-490 - PubMed
- BMC Med. 2017 Aug 2;15(1):139 - PubMed
- J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 10;27(2):206-13 - PubMed
- Psychooncology. 2012 Oct;21(10):1027-33 - PubMed
- Palliat Med. 2014 Mar 18;28(7):965-975 - PubMed
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Aug;24(2):233-5 - PubMed
- J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):837-40 - PubMed
- BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Jun;1(1):56-63 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Pract. 2009 Feb;15(1):41-7 - PubMed
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Oct;38(4):568-77 - PubMed
- JAMA. 2009 Aug 19;302(7):741-9 - PubMed
- Palliat Med. 2014 Mar 24;28(7):959-964 - PubMed
- Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;34(8):762-773 - PubMed
Publication Types