Display options
Share it on

Oncotarget. 2018 Mar 30;9(24):17104-17116. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24936. eCollection 2018 Mar 30.

Development of a quantitative pharmacodynamic assay for apoptosis in fixed tumor tissue and its application in distinguishing cytotoxic drug-induced DNA double strand breaks from DNA double strand breaks associated with apoptosis.

Oncotarget

Angie B Dull, Deborah Wilsker, Melinda Hollingshead, Christina Mazcko, Christina M Annunziata, Amy K LeBlanc, James H Doroshow, Robert J Kinders, Ralph E Parchment

Affiliations

  1. Clinical Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Program, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
  2. Biological Testing Branch, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
  3. Comparative Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  4. Women's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  5. Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis and Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

PMID: 29682208 PMCID: PMC5908309 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24936

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by cancer therapeutic agents can lead to DNA damage repair or persistent DNA damage, which can induce apoptotic cell death; however, apoptosis also induces DSBs independent of genotoxic insult. γH2AX is an established biomarker for DSBs but cannot distinguish between these mechanisms. Activated cleaved caspase-3 (CC3) promotes apoptosis by enhancing nuclear condensation, DNA fragmentation, and plasma membrane blebbing. Here, we describe an immunofluorescence assay that distinguishes between apoptosis and drug-induced DSBs by measuring coexpression of γH2AX and membrane blebbing-associated CC3 to indicate apoptosis, and γH2AX in the absence of CC3 blebbing to indicate drug-induced DNA damage. These markers were examined in xenograft models following treatment with topotecan, cisplatin, or birinapant. A topotecan regimen conferring tumor regression induced tumor cell DSBs resulting from both apoptosis and direct DNA damage. In contrast, a cisplatin regimen yielding tumor growth delay, but not regression, resulted in tumor cell DSBs due solely to direct DNA damage. MDA-MB-231 xenografts exposed to birinapant, which promotes apoptosis but does not directly induce DSBs, exhibited dose-dependent increases in colocalized γH2AX/CC3 blebbing in tumor cells. Clinical feasibility was established using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsies from a canine cancer clinical trial; γH2AX/CC3 colocalization analysis revealed apoptosis induction by two novel indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors, which was consistent with pathologist-assessed apoptosis and reduction of tumor volume. This assay is ready for use in clinical trials to elucidate the mechanism of action of investigational agents and combination regimens intended to inflict DNA damage, apoptotic cell death, or both.

Keywords: DNA double strand breaks; apoptosis; immunofluorescence; multiplex; pharmacodynamic assay

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cell Stem Cell. 2008 Jun 5;2(6):595-601 - PubMed
  2. Mol Cell. 2006 Jul 7;23(1):121-32 - PubMed
  3. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3409-15 - PubMed
  4. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 Apr;13(4):867-79 - PubMed
  5. J Med Chem. 2014 Feb 27;57(4):1495-512 - PubMed
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11025-30 - PubMed
  7. Cancer Res. 2000 Nov 1;60(21):6039-44 - PubMed
  8. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Feb 15;22(4):1000-10 - PubMed
  9. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jan;137(2):359-71 - PubMed
  10. FASEB J. 2005 Oct;19(12):1671-3 - PubMed
  11. J Med Chem. 2014 May 8;57(9):3666-77 - PubMed
  12. Methods. 2008 Mar;44(3):255-61 - PubMed
  13. J Cell Biol. 1998 Jan 12;140(1):153-8 - PubMed
  14. J Cell Biol. 2000 Mar 20;148(6):1239-54 - PubMed
  15. J Clin Invest. 2004 Dec;114(12):1704-13 - PubMed
  16. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2014 Sep 1;771:23-9 - PubMed
  17. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 15;20(10):2578-86 - PubMed
  18. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997 Jul;45(7):923-34 - PubMed
  19. Cancer. 2016 Feb 15;122(4):588-597 - PubMed
  20. Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):19-34 - PubMed
  21. Hepatology. 2016 Sep;64(3):966-76 - PubMed
  22. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Jun;71(12):2289-97 - PubMed
  23. Curr Biol. 2015 Mar 2;25(5):577-88 - PubMed
  24. Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 15;16(22):5447-57 - PubMed
  25. Blood. 2002 Dec 15;100(13):4446-53 - PubMed
  26. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jul 1;22(13):3227-37 - PubMed
  27. J Pathol. 2003 Feb;199(2):221-8 - PubMed
  28. J Cell Sci. 2014 Apr 1;127(Pt 7):1464-75 - PubMed
  29. J Histochem Cytochem. 2009 Apr;57(4):289-300 - PubMed
  30. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Apr 1;19(7):1784-94 - PubMed

Publication Types