Cite
Hakimi Z, Kelleher C, Aballéa S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of solifenacin compared with oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the UK. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018;6(1):1438721doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1438721.
Hakimi, Z., Kelleher, C., Aballéa, S., Maman, K., Nazir, J., Mankowski, C., & Odeyemi, I. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of solifenacin compared with oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the UK. Journal of market access & health policy, 6(1), 1438721. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1438721
Hakimi, Zalmai, et al. "Cost-effectiveness of solifenacin compared with oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the UK." Journal of market access & health policy vol. 6,1 (2018): 1438721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2018.1438721
Hakimi Z, Kelleher C, Aballéa S, Maman K, Nazir J, Mankowski C, Odeyemi I. Cost-effectiveness of solifenacin compared with oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of patients with overactive bladder in the UK. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2018 Mar 20;6(1):1438721. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2018.1438721. eCollection 2018. PMID: 29686801; PMCID: PMC5907635.
Copy
Download .nbib