Display options
Share it on

J Orthop Case Rep. 2018 Jan-Feb;8(1):3-7. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.972.

The Challenges of the Femoral Bone Loss in the Management of the Floating Knee IIB According Fraser: A Case Report.

Journal of orthopaedic case reports

Serafino Carta, Alberto Riva, Mattia Fortina, Giovanni Battista Colasanti, Luigi Meccariello

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Siena, University Hospital "Santa Maria Alle Scotte," Siena, Italy.
  2. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
  3. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.

PMID: 29854682 PMCID: PMC5974666 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.972

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This case report describes the management and the possible therapeutic solutions for the treatment of femoral bone loss associated with an open fracture IIIB Gustilo Andersonin a polytrauma that includes floating knee (GF) Fraser IIB from damage control orthopedics to final treatment.

CASE REPORT: The patient was treated with an external fixator femorotibial bridge after extensive cleaning and debridement of open fractures. After 17-day post-trauma, we substitute the fixator with a less invasive stabilization system plate and screws with contralateral allograft bone strut.3months after the first surgery, the patient underwent surgery for the intramedullary nailing of the tibia. The follow-up was clinical using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), short form 12 health survey (SF-12) for quality of life, and radiological at 1-3-6-12-18-24-36 months. The patient walked with partial load up until the 6months after injury and then began a progression to a total load. At 24-months post surgery, the patient had both the KOOS and SF-12 at 100 points.

CONCLUSION: Not all Fraser IIB are equal, the timing of treatment should be discussed case by case. The surgical sequence should be respected: First, the fixation of the femur, and then, the stabilization of the tibia, taking into account the condition of the skin, eventual exposure or the eventual level of sub-amputation of the limb. The clinical and radiographic results show how efficient damage can lay the foundations for an excellent definitive treatment.

Keywords: Bone loss; bone allograft strut; bone reimplant; external fixation; floating knee; outcomes

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Nil

References

  1. Bone. 2003 May;32(5):521-31 - PubMed
  2. Biomed Eng Online. 2010 Sep 10;9:48 - PubMed
  3. Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1191-3 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):RD01-3 - PubMed
  5. Drugs. 1997 Nov;54(5):679-708 - PubMed
  6. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;3(2):133-9 - PubMed
  7. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29 - PubMed
  8. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jan 14;10:7 - PubMed
  9. Chirurg. 2016 Feb;87(2):165-73; quiz 174-5 - PubMed
  10. Injury. 2014 Jun;45(6):934-41 - PubMed
  11. Pol J Microbiol. 2016;65(1):23-32 - PubMed
  12. Open Orthop J. 2015 Jul 31;9:332-46 - PubMed
  13. Indian J Orthop. 2008 Oct;42(4):377-86 - PubMed
  14. Orthopedics. 2003 Jul;26(7):695-9 - PubMed
  15. Malays Orthop J. 2014 Jul;8(2):66-8 - PubMed
  16. Int Orthop. 2006 Oct;30(5):325-8 - PubMed
  17. J Res Med Sci. 2013 Dec;18(12):1087-91 - PubMed

Publication Types