J Orthop Case Rep. 2018 Jan-Feb;8(1):3-7. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.972.
The Challenges of the Femoral Bone Loss in the Management of the Floating Knee IIB According Fraser: A Case Report.
Journal of orthopaedic case reports
Serafino Carta, Alberto Riva, Mattia Fortina, Giovanni Battista Colasanti, Luigi Meccariello
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Siena, University Hospital "Santa Maria Alle Scotte," Siena, Italy.
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy.
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
PMID: 29854682
PMCID: PMC5974666 DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2250-0685.972
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This case report describes the management and the possible therapeutic solutions for the treatment of femoral bone loss associated with an open fracture IIIB Gustilo Andersonin a polytrauma that includes floating knee (GF) Fraser IIB from damage control orthopedics to final treatment.
CASE REPORT: The patient was treated with an external fixator femorotibial bridge after extensive cleaning and debridement of open fractures. After 17-day post-trauma, we substitute the fixator with a less invasive stabilization system plate and screws with contralateral allograft bone strut.3months after the first surgery, the patient underwent surgery for the intramedullary nailing of the tibia. The follow-up was clinical using the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), short form 12 health survey (SF-12) for quality of life, and radiological at 1-3-6-12-18-24-36 months. The patient walked with partial load up until the 6months after injury and then began a progression to a total load. At 24-months post surgery, the patient had both the KOOS and SF-12 at 100 points.
CONCLUSION: Not all Fraser IIB are equal, the timing of treatment should be discussed case by case. The surgical sequence should be respected: First, the fixation of the femur, and then, the stabilization of the tibia, taking into account the condition of the skin, eventual exposure or the eventual level of sub-amputation of the limb. The clinical and radiographic results show how efficient damage can lay the foundations for an excellent definitive treatment.
Keywords: Bone loss; bone allograft strut; bone reimplant; external fixation; floating knee; outcomes
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: Nil
References
- Bone. 2003 May;32(5):521-31 - PubMed
- Biomed Eng Online. 2010 Sep 10;9:48 - PubMed
- Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1191-3 - PubMed
- J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Nov;9(11):RD01-3 - PubMed
- Drugs. 1997 Nov;54(5):679-708 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;3(2):133-9 - PubMed
- Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29 - PubMed
- BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jan 14;10:7 - PubMed
- Chirurg. 2016 Feb;87(2):165-73; quiz 174-5 - PubMed
- Injury. 2014 Jun;45(6):934-41 - PubMed
- Pol J Microbiol. 2016;65(1):23-32 - PubMed
- Open Orthop J. 2015 Jul 31;9:332-46 - PubMed
- Indian J Orthop. 2008 Oct;42(4):377-86 - PubMed
- Orthopedics. 2003 Jul;26(7):695-9 - PubMed
- Malays Orthop J. 2014 Jul;8(2):66-8 - PubMed
- Int Orthop. 2006 Oct;30(5):325-8 - PubMed
- J Res Med Sci. 2013 Dec;18(12):1087-91 - PubMed
Publication Types