Display options
Share it on

Turk J Urol. 2018 Sep;44(5):411-417. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.45556. Epub 2018 Mar 09.

Bladder-related quality of life in people with neurological disorders: reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the King's Health Questionnaire in people with spinal cord injury.

Turkish journal of urology

Hale Karapolat, Yeşim Akkoç, Sibel Eyigör, Göksel Tanıgör

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ege University School of Medicine, ?zmir, Turkey.

PMID: 29799397 PMCID: PMC6134979 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.45556

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to compare the bladder- related quality of life between patients with SCI and multiple sclerosis (MS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with SCI and 57 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were included in the study. For analysis of test-retest reliability, the Turkish version of the KHQ scale was developed using the back translation method, and it was administered on the day of admission and again one week later. The Qualiveen and SF-36 questionnaires were administered to the patients for validity analysis. Moreover, the results of KHQ that had been administered to 35 patients with SCI were compared with those of 57 patients with MS.

RESULTS: Both the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.68-0.93) and the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.69-0.94) of the KHQ in patients with SCI were found to be high. Although a weak correlation between the subscales of the KHQ and SF-36, a moderate correlation between the subscales of KHQ, and the Qualiveen questionnaire (0.34

CONCLUSION: The KHQ scale is an internally consistent, reliable, and valid scale for people with SCI. In addition, bladder-related quality of life was poorer in patients with SCI than in MS patients.

References

  1. Actas Urol Esp. 2010 Jun;34(6):537-42 - PubMed
  2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jan 31;11:13 - PubMed
  3. Qual Life Res. 2003 Jun;12(4):427-42 - PubMed
  4. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Dec;80(12):916-22 - PubMed
  5. Qual Life Res. 2010 Apr;19(3):323-31 - PubMed
  6. Urology. 1985 Apr;25(4):429-31 - PubMed
  7. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Aug;25(8):1133-5 - PubMed
  8. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Nov;32(8):1047-57 - PubMed
  9. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;35(3):323-31; quiz 332-3 - PubMed
  10. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(2):94-100 - PubMed
  11. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(1):63-8 - PubMed
  12. Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):425-31 - PubMed
  13. Spinal Cord. 1997 Aug;35(8):531-3 - PubMed
  14. Neuroepidemiology. 2011;37(3-4):231-5 - PubMed
  15. Neurol Sci. 2011 Jun;32(3):417-21 - PubMed
  16. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jul;26(7):1027-33 - PubMed
  17. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;94(6):1054-61 - PubMed
  18. Neurourol Urodyn. 1998;17(2):89-98 - PubMed
  19. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009;41(1):29-33 - PubMed
  20. Rehabil Nurs. 2004 Jul-Aug;29(4):122-6 - PubMed
  21. BJU Int. 2006 Oct;98(4):739-45 - PubMed
  22. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1757-63 - PubMed
  23. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):8-14 - PubMed
  24. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(19):1567-76 - PubMed
  25. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Jun;73(6):558-63 - PubMed
  26. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Dec;104(12):1374-9 - PubMed

Publication Types