Front Psychol. 2018 May 08;9:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00667. eCollection 2018.

Mathematical (Dis)abilities Within the Opportunity-Propensity Model: The Choice of Math Test Matters.

Frontiers in psychology

Elke Baten, Annemie Desoete

PMID: 29867645 PMCID: PMC5952253 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00667

Abstract

This study examined individual differences in mathematics learning by combining antecedent (A), opportunity (O), and propensity (P) indicators within the Opportunity-Propensity Model. Although there is already some evidence for this model based on secondary datasets, there currently is no primary data available that simultaneously takes into account A, O, and P factors in children with and without Mathematical Learning Disabilities (MLD). Therefore, the mathematical abilities of 114 school-aged children (grade 3 till 6) with and without MLD were analyzed and combined with information retrieved from standardized tests and questionnaires. Results indicated significant differences in personality, motivation, temperament, subjective well-being, self-esteem, self-perceived competence, and parental aspirations when comparing children with and without MLD. In addition, A, O, and P factors were found to underlie mathematical abilities and disabilities. For the A factors, parental aspirations explained about half of the variance in fact retrieval speed in children without MLD, and SES was especially involved in the prediction of procedural accuracy in general. Teachers' experience contributed as O factor and explained about 6% of the variance in mathematical abilities. P indicators explained between 52 and 69% of the variance, with especially intelligence as overall significant predictor. Indirect effects pointed towards the interrelatedness of the predictors and the value of including A, O, and P indicators in a comprehensive model. The role parental aspirations played in fact retrieval speed was partially mediated through the self-perceived competence of the children, whereas the effect of SES on procedural accuracy was partially mediated through intelligence in children of both groups and through working memory capacity in children with MLD. Moreover, in line with the componential structure of mathematics, our findings were dependent on the math task used. Different A, O, and P indicators seemed to be important for fact retrieval speed compared to procedural accuracy. Also, mathematical development type (MLD or typical development) mattered since some A, O, and P factors were predictive for MLD only and the other way around. Practical implications of these findings and recommendations for future research on MLD and on individual differences in mathematical abilities are provided.

Keywords: Mathematical Learning Disabilities; Opportunity-Propensity Model; motivation; personality; self-esteem; self-perceived competence; subjective well-being; temperament

References

1. J Learn Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):250-68 - PubMed
2. J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):96-112 - PubMed
3. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006 Jan-Feb;82(1):6-14 - PubMed
4. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Jan;174(1):1-13 - PubMed
5. Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Jan;72 :106-117 - PubMed
6. Psychophysiology. 2015 Apr;52(4):544-54 - PubMed
7. J Learn Disabil. 2016 Jan-Feb;49(1):3-20 - PubMed
8. Br J Educ Psychol. 2008 Sep;78(Pt 3):491-506 - PubMed
9. J Popul Econ. 2015 Oct 1;28(4):911-936 - PubMed
10. Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Mar;75(Pt 1):119-38 - PubMed
11. Health Econ. 2014 Sep;23(9):1013-35 - PubMed
12. Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):322-38 - PubMed
13. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2009;15(1):60-8 - PubMed
14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):766-779 - PubMed
15. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):968-70 - PubMed
16. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78 - PubMed
17. J Learn Disabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;46(5):461-72 - PubMed
18. J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):83-95 - PubMed
19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article