Display options
Share it on

Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Sep 19;21(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty132.

Orthodox and Unorthodox Uses of Electronic Cigarettes: A Surveillance of YouTube Video Content.

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco

Mignonne C Guy, Jacob Helt, Sherilyn Palafox, Kellie Green, Eric K Soule, Sarah F Maloney, Thomas Eissenberg, Pebbles Fagan

Affiliations

  1. Department of African American Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
  2. Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
  3. University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI.
  4. Center for the Study of Tobacco, Department Health Behavior and Health Education, Fay Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
  5. Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

PMID: 29961828 PMCID: PMC6751517 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty132

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Open electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) systems are customizable by consumers and often allow for potential "unorthodox" use of the product; that is, use not as intended by the manufacturer. Little is known about the types and prevalence of unorthodox uses and how these practices are transmitted via popular social media.

METHODS: Monthly searches of YouTube were conducted from June through November 2016 using the following search terms: "e-cigarettes," "vaping," and "e-juice." After collecting static and dynamic data on the 150 videos identified, two coders independently coded videos for general information, unorthodox use behaviors, health claims, and production quality and characteristics for orthodox and unorthodox use. Intercoder reliability was high (Cohen's κ 0.81, p < .001).

RESULTS: One hundred fifty videos were included in the study with a total of 115 551 563 views. We identified nine categories of unorthodox uses of e-cigarettes. Unorthodox use was three times as prevalent as orthodox use. Seventy-seven percent of the unorthodox use videos included recreational e-cigarette use, 57% included modification of mechanical parts and components, and 44.6% included unorthodox substance application (dripping). There were more than twice as many social media links in videos depicting unorthodox compared to orthodox use, but the level of engagement was lower for unorthodox use.

CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette unorthodox use on YouTube is more prevalent than orthodox use, suggesting the need to further investigate the prevalence of unorthodox use among e-cigarette users and the influence of social media on consumer uptake of unorthodox and orthodox uses of e-cigarettes.

IMPLICATIONS: The US Food and Drug Administration has regulatory authority over e-cigarettes, parts and components. Many e-cigarettes currently marketed are open systems. Closed systems may allow less manipulation and may influence the safety of these products. This study provides valuable information on ways that open system e-cigarettes are used and it can inform safety tests that can be conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration to determine whether or not these products should remain on the market. In addition, our definitions of unorthodox use can be incorporated into the Population Assessment of Tobacco on Health Study to better understand the prevalence of these behaviors.

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].

References

  1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Apr;1394(1):5-30 - PubMed
  2. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Feb;52(2):e33-e66 - PubMed
  3. Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:248-60 - PubMed
  4. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Jan;170(1):89-91 - PubMed
  5. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Oct;18(10):1998-2005 - PubMed
  6. Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(Suppl 2):ii88-ii93 - PubMed
  7. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0173055 - PubMed
  8. Tob Control. 2016 Apr;25(e1):e67-8 - PubMed
  9. Tob Control. 2014 Jul;23 Suppl 3:iii3-9 - PubMed
  10. Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(e1):e25-e33 - PubMed
  11. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 7;7(1):7459 - PubMed
  12. Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Sep 6;50(17):9644-51 - PubMed
  13. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 18;18(3):e67 - PubMed
  14. Int J Burns Trauma. 2017 Jan 15;7(1):1-5 - PubMed
  15. J Burn Care Res. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):220-224 - PubMed
  16. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Oct;17(10):1195-202 - PubMed
  17. NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Oct;(217):1-8 - PubMed
  18. Tob Control. 2013 Jan;22(1):19-23 - PubMed
  19. J Health Commun. 2014;19(5):545-60 - PubMed
  20. Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24(4):341-7 - PubMed
  21. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016 May;219(3):268-77 - PubMed
  22. Am J Health Behav. 2015 Nov;39(6):823-31 - PubMed
  23. BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 03;14:1028 - PubMed
  24. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Sep 01;166:168-76 - PubMed
  25. Addiction. 2016 Mar;111(3):535-44 - PubMed
  26. Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e23-e28 - PubMed
  27. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 07;14(6): - PubMed
  28. J Pediatr. 2018 May;196:320-320.e1 - PubMed
  29. Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3): - PubMed
  30. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Feb 1;183:43-50 - PubMed
  31. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 May 1;171(5):490-492 - PubMed
  32. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 May;18(5):715-9 - PubMed
  33. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Apr;18(4):453-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types