Display options
Share it on

J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(521):328-339. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1251930. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

Multiple Testing of Submatrices of a Precision Matrix with Applications to Identification of Between Pathway Interactions.

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Yin Xia, Tianxi Cai, T Tony Cai

Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, Fudan University and Department of Statistics & Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  2. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University.
  3. Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

PMID: 29881130 PMCID: PMC5988269 DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1251930

Abstract

Making accurate inference for gene regulatory networks, including inferring about pathway by pathway interactions, is an important and difficult task. Motivated by such genomic applications, we consider multiple testing for conditional dependence between subgroups of variables. Under a Gaussian graphical model framework, the problem is translated into simultaneous testing for a collection of submatrices of a high-dimensional precision matrix with each submatrix summarizing the dependence structure between two subgroups of variables. A novel multiple testing procedure is proposed and both theoretical and numerical properties of the procedure are investigated. Asymptotic null distribution of the test statistic for an individual hypothesis is established and the proposed multiple testing procedure is shown to asymptotically control the false discovery rate (FDR) and false discovery proportion (FDP) at the pre-specified level under regularity conditions. Simulations show that the procedure works well in controlling the FDR and has good power in detecting the true interactions. The procedure is applied to a breast cancer gene expression study to identify between pathway interactions.

Keywords: Between pathway interactions; Gaussian graphical model; conditional dependence; covariance structure; false discovery proportion; false discovery rate; multiple testing; precision matrix; testing submatrices

References

  1. Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 15;24(12):1442-7 - PubMed
  2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D619-22 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50 - PubMed
  4. Am J Hum Genet. 2006 Dec;79(6):1002-16 - PubMed
  5. J Multivar Anal. 2016 Jan 1;143:107-126 - PubMed
  6. J Carcinog. 2008;7:9 - PubMed
  7. J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(513):229-240 - PubMed
  8. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(2):e1002375 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 2005 Oct 20;437(7062):1173-8 - PubMed
  10. Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):530-6 - PubMed
  11. Biometrika. 2015 Jun;102(2):247-266 - PubMed
  12. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 15;11(2 Pt 2):865s-70s - PubMed
  13. BMC Syst Biol. 2010 Sep 13;4 Suppl 2:S11 - PubMed
  14. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jul;69(1):138-47 - PubMed
  15. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):303-5 - PubMed
  16. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2008;70(5):849-911 - PubMed
  17. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 16;96(12):926-35 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Invest. 2008 Sep;118(9):3065-74 - PubMed
  19. Bioinformatics. 2009 Sep 15;25(18):2348-54 - PubMed
  20. Genet Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;32(3):255-63 - PubMed
  21. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1999;:77-86 - PubMed
  22. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3905-9 - PubMed
  23. BMC Syst Biol. 2011;5 Suppl 3:S12 - PubMed
  24. Genet Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;28(2):157-70 - PubMed
  25. Nat Biotechnol. 2005 May;23(5):561-6 - PubMed
  26. Cell Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):71-88 - PubMed
  27. J Biol Chem. 2004 Sep 24;279(39):40255-8 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support