Display options
Share it on

Open J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul 23;10:1179065218789375. doi: 10.1177/1179065218789375. eCollection 2018.

Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting: Sternal Wound Infection in High-Risk Population. Should Sternal Infection Scare Us?.

Open journal of cardiovascular surgery

Justine Mafalda Ravaux, Thami Guennaoui, Christian Mélot, Peter Schraverus

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
  2. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Centres Hospitaliers Jolimont ASBL, Haine Saint Paul, Belgium.
  3. Department of Emergency, Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.

PMID: 30046252 PMCID: PMC6056780 DOI: 10.1177/1179065218789375

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMAs) remain underused in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), especially in elderly, diabetic, and obese patients. This study investigated incidence of sternal wound infection (SWI), sternal instability (SI), and reintervention for bleeding (RIB) in this high-risk population.

METHODS: A single-center retrospective observational study was performed in "Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Gilly, Belgium." A total of 319 patients undergoing CABG from December 2011 to December 2015 were included. Three main outcome measures (SWI, SI, and RIB) were investigated in obese vs nonobese, diabetic vs nondiabetic, and elderly vs younger patients.

RESULTS: In all, 14 SWI, 11 SI, and 6 RIB were discounted. Death rate was as follows: SWI: 2/14 vs 17/305 (

CONCLUSIONS: Obesity, age, and diabetes treated by insulin (or not) do not seem to be risk factors for developing SWI, SI, or RIB in patients receiving a CABG using BIMA. Nevertheless, mortality was higher in RIB group.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting; reintervention; sternal instability; sternal wound infection

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Semin Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;25(1):25-33 - PubMed
  2. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Nov;126(5):1314-9 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002 May;21(5):825-30 - PubMed
  4. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jun;95(6):1938-45 - PubMed
  5. Circulation. 1973 Jul;48(1 Suppl):III190-7 - PubMed
  6. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Feb;48(1):1-8 - PubMed
  7. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986 Jul;42(1):1-2 - PubMed
  8. Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt B):133-9 - PubMed
  9. Lancet. 2001 Sep 15;358(9285):870-5 - PubMed
  10. JAMA. 1973 Feb 12;223(7):792-4 - PubMed
  11. Heart. 2013 Jun;99(12):849-53 - PubMed
  12. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jul;2(4):485-92 - PubMed
  13. Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt B):171-8 - PubMed
  14. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jul;100(1):8-14; discussion 14-5 - PubMed
  15. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2015 May 20;104(11):575-80 - PubMed
  16. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2011 Mar;22(1):5-15 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):776-7 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jul;48(1):115-20 - PubMed
  19. Am J Infect Control. 1988 Jun;16(3):128-40 - PubMed
  20. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jul;124(1):136-45 - PubMed
  21. Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt B):131-2 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1188-1195 - PubMed
  23. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):532-8 - PubMed
  24. Int J Surg. 2015 Apr;16(Pt B):179-82 - PubMed
  25. Circ J. 2016 Jul 25;80(8):1756-63 - PubMed
  26. Tex Heart Inst J. 2013;40(2):125-39 - PubMed
  27. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 2;314(1):1-6 - PubMed
  28. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2699-705 - PubMed

Publication Types