Display options
Share it on

Transl J Am Coll Sports Med. 2018 May;3(9):66-71.

If You Build It, Will They Come? A Quasi-experiment of Sidewalk Improvements and Physical Activity.

Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine

Gregory Knell, Casey P Durand, Kerem Shuval, Harold W Kohl, Deborah Salvo, Abiodun Olyuomi, Kelley Pettee Gabriel

Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX.
  2. Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) at Houston School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX.
  3. Department of Intramural Research, Economic and Health Policy Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.
  4. Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHealth) at Houston School of Public Health in Austin, Austin, TX.
  5. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  6. Environmental Health Service, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, TX.
  7. Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

PMID: 30148210 PMCID: PMC6105313

Abstract

Improving sidewalks could lead to more physical activity through improved access, while providing a safe and defined space to walk. Yet, findings on the association between sidewalks and physical activity are inconclusive.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine changes in self-reported and accelerometer-derived physical activity associated with living near recently improved sidewalks in a diverse, community-based sample from the Houston Travel Related Activity in Neighborhoods (TRAIN) Study.

METHODS: Data are from 430 adults and include baseline and first annual follow-up (2014-2017). Fully adjusted, two-step regression models were built to test the hypothesis that living near (within 250-meters) an improved sidewalk was associated with greater levels of physical activity than not living near an improved sidewalk.

RESULTS: The majority of participants were female, non-Hispanic black, low income, low education, and nearly half lived near at least one improved sidewalk. After adjustment, among participants reporting some physical activity, living near two sidewalk improvements was associated with 1.6 times more minutes per week of walking and leisure-time physical activity than those not living near a sidewalk improvement (p<0.05). Based on accelerometry, which does not specifically quantify domain-specific physical activity, there were no significant associations.

CONCLUSION: Although these mixed findings warrant further research, results suggest that improving sidewalks may have an effect on participants' physical activity. Nonspecific definitions of sidewalk improvements could be contributing to type 1 error. Future work should also examine behavioral interventions alongside changes to the built environment to determine the effects on physical activity.

Keywords: accelerometer; built-environment; physical activity; quasi-experimental; urban health

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest The authors declare there is no conflict of interest. The results of the present study do not constitute an endorsement by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM).

References

  1. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Nov 13;8:125 - PubMed
  2. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):177-85 - PubMed
  3. Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Nov 19;8:62 - PubMed
  4. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29 - PubMed
  5. Prev Med. 2002 Dec;35(6):601-11 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1123-4 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1337-48 - PubMed
  8. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):134-40 - PubMed
  9. Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1325-36 - PubMed
  10. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Dec 07;7:86 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):294-305 - PubMed
  12. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81 - PubMed
  13. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Feb;28(2 Suppl 2):105-16 - PubMed
  14. Health Psychol. 2016 Jun;35(6):552-62 - PubMed
  15. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1403-12 - PubMed
  16. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Mar;14(3):435-42 - PubMed
  17. Am J Public Health. 2001 Dec;91(12):1995-2003 - PubMed
  18. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 May;30(5):777-81 - PubMed
  19. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Oct;44(10):2009-16 - PubMed
  20. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):233-244 - PubMed
  21. J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S55-S76 - PubMed
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Oct;6(10):2639-54 - PubMed
  23. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S550-66 - PubMed
  24. Front Public Health. 2016 Jun 09;4:103 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support