Display options
Cite
Mousavi SA, Khademi A, Soltani P, et al. Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018;15(5):307-312
Mousavi, S. A., Khademi, A., Soltani, P., Shahnaseri, S., & Poorghorban, M. (2018). Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique. Dental research journal, 15(5), 307-312.
Mousavi, Seyed Amir, et al. "Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique." Dental research journal vol. 15,5 (2018): 307-312.
Mousavi SA, Khademi A, Soltani P, Shahnaseri S, Poorghorban M. Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Sep-Oct;15(5):307-312. PMID: 30233649; PMCID: PMC6134730.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Sep-Oct;15(5):307-312.

Comparison of sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and ortho mineral trioxide aggregate for canal obturation by the fluid infiltration technique.

Dental research journal

Seyed Amir Mousavi, Abbasali Khademi, Parisa Soltani, Shirin Shahnaseri, Marzie Poorghorban

Affiliations

  1. Dental Research Center, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  2. Department of Oral Radiology, Dental School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Implant Dental Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  4. Dentist, Isfahan, Iran.

PMID: 30233649 PMCID: PMC6134730

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adequate seal of the root canal is necessary to prevent recontamination and ensure the long-term clinical success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sealing ability of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and Ortho MTA as the root canal obturation materials using the fluid infiltration method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this invitro study a total of 66 extracted human mandibular premolars were randomly divided into five groups according to the material used for the root canal obturation. Group I - ProRoot MTA (20 samples), Group II - Biodentine (20 samples), Group III - Ortho MTA (20 samples), Group IV - negative group (3 samples), and Group V-positive group (3 samples). MTA, Biodentine, and Ortho MTA were applied using a cotton-tipped K-file #30 and hand plugger into the root canals of each group. In Group 4 (negative control), no filling material was used. In Group 5 (positive control), a single gutta-percha size #40 was inserted into the root canal without using a sealer. The teeth were mounted and exposed to the fluid infiltrarion system. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis test the level of significance was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS: Mean values of microleakage in MTA ProRoot, Biodentine and Ortho MTA groups were 1.83 ± 0.62, 1.95 ± 1.27 and 1.72 ± 0.83 μL in 8 minutes. No statistically significant difference was observed between the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and Ortho MTA (

CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, microleakage values were similar to MTA ProRoot, Biodentine, and Ortho MTA using the fluid infiltration technique.

Keywords: Dental leakage; filtration; mineral trioxide aggregate; root canal filling materials

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declared that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, and financial or nonfinancial in this article.

References

  1. J Endod. 2012 Dec;38(12):1627-30 - PubMed
  2. J Endod. 1993 Nov;19(11):541-4 - PubMed
  3. J Endod. 2011 Dec;37(12):1673-6 - PubMed
  4. J Conserv Dent. 2014 Jul;17(4):340-3 - PubMed
  5. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:160951 - PubMed
  6. Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):326-30 - PubMed
  7. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(4):487-492 - PubMed
  8. Int Endod J. 1993 Jul;26(4):203-8 - PubMed
  9. Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):214-8 - PubMed
  10. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:105863 - PubMed
  11. Iran Endod J. 2016 Spring;11(2):85-90 - PubMed
  12. Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):439-48 - PubMed
  13. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994 Jun;10(3):105-8 - PubMed
  14. J Dent Res. 2012 Dec;91(12):1166-71 - PubMed
  15. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1220-6 - PubMed
  16. J Endod. 2010 Mar;36(3):400-13 - PubMed
  17. J Endod. 2004 Feb;30(2):103-6 - PubMed
  18. J Endod. 1999 Mar;25(3):197-205 - PubMed
  19. J Endod. 2005 Jun;31(6):453-6 - PubMed
  20. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Jun;15(3):147-58 - PubMed
  21. J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Oct;56(4):435-40 - PubMed
  22. Int Endod J. 2000 Mar;33(2):121-5 - PubMed
  23. Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Dec;6(4):227-32 - PubMed
  24. J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1516-9 - PubMed
  25. Int Endod J. 2003 Sep;36(9):610-5 - PubMed
  26. Int Endod J. 2009 Oct;42(10):884-92 - PubMed
  27. Int Endod J. 2007 Nov;40(11):873-81 - PubMed
  28. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996 Aug;12(4):161-78 - PubMed
  29. J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Mar;11(2):143-9 - PubMed
  30. Eur J Dent. 2007 Apr;1(2):97-103 - PubMed

Publication Types