Display options
Share it on

PLoS Curr. 2018 Jul 26;10. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.49e8e547de25ca1c1f9edbbfc8b9efa5.

Community Perspective on Policy Options for Resettlement Management: A Case Study of Risk Reduction in Bududa, Eastern Uganda.

PLoS currents

Stella Neema, Grace Mongo Bua, Doreen Tuhebwe, Julius Ssentongo, Nathan Tumuhamye, Roy William Mayega, James Fishkin, Lynn M Atuyambe, William Bazeyo

Affiliations

  1. College of Humanities, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  2. School of Public Health-Resilient Africa Network, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  3. Department of Health Policy, Planning & Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health-Resilient Africa Network, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  6. Stanford University Center for Deliberative Democracy, ResilientAfrica Network.
  7. Department of Community Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  8. Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

PMID: 30191081 PMCID: PMC6100022 DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.49e8e547de25ca1c1f9edbbfc8b9efa5

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite existing policy actions on Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), many community members in Bududa still continue to settle in high-risk areas re-zoned for nonsettlement. There seems to be an apparent information asymmetry on expectations between the community and Government. The challenge then is '

METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in Bududa in eastern Uganda with fourteen group discussions; comprising 12-15 randomly assigned participants of mixed socio-economic variables. Trained research assistants and moderators collected data. All discussions were audio taped, transcribed verbatim before analysis. Data were analyzed using latent content analysis by identifying codes from which sub-themes were generated and grouped into main themes on policy options for resettlement management.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We used Deliberative Polling, an innovative approach to public policy consultation and found that although the community is in agreement with most government policy options under resettlement management, they lacked an understanding of the rationale underlying these policy options leading to challenges in implementation. The community members seemed uncertain and had mistrust in government's ability to implement the policies especially on issues of compensation for land lost. Key Words: Policy, Deliberative Polling, Climate change, risk-reduction, landslides, Uganda.

References

  1. Br J Nutr. 2016 Feb 28;115(4):718-29 - PubMed
  2. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015 Apr 25;15:9 - PubMed
  3. PLoS Curr. 2016 Jul 11;8:null - PubMed
  4. Environ Health. 2011 May 14;10:38 - PubMed
  5. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 - PubMed

Publication Types