J Exp Orthop. 2018 Sep 29;5(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40634-018-0154-4.

Biomechanical properties of adjustable extracortical graft fixations in ACL reconstruction.

Journal of experimental orthopaedics

M Ettinger, R Karkosch, H Horstmann, P Savov, T Calliess, T Smith, M Petri,

PMID: 30269194 PMCID: PMC6163122 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-018-0154-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reliable biomechanical data about the strength of different tibial extracortical graft fixation devices is sparse. This biomechanical study compares the properties of tibial graft fixation in ACL reconstruction with either the ACL Tight Rope™ or the Rigid Loop Adjustable™ device. The hypothesis was that both fixation devices would provide comparable results concerning gap formation during cyclic loading and ultimate failure load.

METHODS: Sixteen sawbone tibiae (Sawbones™) underwent extracortical fixation of porcine flexor digitorum profundus grafts for ACL reconstruction. Either the ACL Tight Rope™ (Arthrex) or the Rigid Loop Adjustable™ (DePuy Mitek) fixation device were used, resulting in 2 groups with 8 specimens per group. Biomechanical analysis included pretensioning the constructs 10 times with 0.75 Hz, then cyclic loading of 1,000 position-controlled cycles and 1,000 force-controlled cycles applied with a servohydraulic testing machine. Elongation during cyclic loading was recorded. After this, ultimate failure load and failure mode analysis were performed.

RESULTS: No statistically significant difference could be noted between the groups regarding gap formation during cyclic loading (4.6 ± 2.6 mm for the Rigid Loop Adjustable™ vs. 6.6 ± 1.5 mm for the ACL Tight Rope™ (p > 0.05)), and ultimate failure loads (980 ± 101.9 N for the Rigid Loop Adjustable™ vs. 861 ± 115 N ACL Tight Rope™ (p > 0.05)).

CONCLUSION: ACL Tight Rope™ and the Rigid Loop Adjustable™ fixation devices yield comparable biomechanical results for tibial extracortical graft fixation in ACL reconstruction. These findings may be of relevance for the future surgical decision-making in ACL reconstruction. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing both fixation devices are desirable for the future.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Tibial fixation, Extracortical graft fixation, Biomechanics

References

1. Arthroscopy. 2002 Feb;18(2):124-35 - PubMed
2. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):416-22 - PubMed
3. J Orthop Res. 2000 May;18(3):456-61 - PubMed
4. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1613-1616 - PubMed
5. Arthroscopy. 2016 Oct;32(10):2050-2059 - PubMed
6. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;27(1):35-43 - PubMed
7. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Dec;75(12):1795-803 - PubMed
8. Arthroscopy. 2001 May;17(5):461-76 - PubMed
9. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1380-5 - PubMed
10. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 May-Jun;13(3):197-207 - PubMed
11. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(1):32-5 - PubMed
12. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):154-60 - PubMed
13. Arthroscopy. 1997 Apr;13(2):238-44 - PubMed
14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Mar;66(3):344-52 - PubMed
15. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(4):215-9 - PubMed
16. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002 Mar;10(2):80-5 - PubMed
17. Am J Sports Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;28(5):705-10 - PubMed
18. Arthroscopy. 2002 Feb;18(2):113-23 - PubMed
19. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 May;136(5):681-6 - PubMed
20. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Mar;38(3):613-20 - PubMed
21. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):343-9 - PubMed
22. J Biomech. 2008 Nov 14;41(15):3282-4 - PubMed
23. Arthroscopy. 2001 Jan;17(1):73-6 - PubMed
24. Knee. 2015 Sep;22(4):304-8 - PubMed
25. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Apr;25(4):1241-1248 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article