Display options
Share it on

PeerJ. 2018 Sep 26;6:e5663. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5663. eCollection 2018.

Wind-driven spume droplet production and the transport of .

PeerJ

Renee B Pietsch, Hinrich Grothe, Regina Hanlon, Craig W Powers, Sunghwan Jung, Shane D Ross, David G Schmale Iii

Affiliations

  1. Biological Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
  2. School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
  3. Institute of Materials Chemistry (E165), TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
  4. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
  5. Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech), Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.

PMID: 30280035 PMCID: PMC6163035 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5663

Abstract

Natural aquatic environments such as oceans, lakes, and rivers are home to a tremendous diversity of microorganisms. Some may cross the air-water interface within droplets and become airborne, with the potential to impact the Earth's radiation budget, precipitation processes, and spread of disease. Larger droplets are likely to return to the water or adjacent land, but smaller droplets may be suspended in the atmosphere for transport over long distances. Here, we report on a series of controlled laboratory experiments to quantify wind-driven droplet production from a freshwater source for low wind speeds. The rate of droplet production increased quadratically with wind speed above a critical value (10-m equivalent 5.7 m/s) where droplet production initiated. Droplet diameter and ejection speeds were fit by a gamma distribution. The droplet mass flux and momentum flux increased with wind speed. Two mechanisms of droplet production, bubble bursting and fragmentation, yielded different distributions for diameter, speed, and angle. At a wind speed of about 3.5 m/s, aqueous suspensions of the ice-nucleating bacterium

Keywords: Aerosol; Air-water interface; Aquatic microbiology; Bacteria; Bioprecipitation; Bubble bursting; Droplet; Ice nucleation; Pseudomonas syringae; Wind

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

References

  1. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007 Jul 15;365(1856):1753-74 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):5970-5 - PubMed
  3. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:591-611 - PubMed
  4. J Pathog. 2013;2013:493960 - PubMed
  5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;353:201-8 - PubMed
  6. Front Microbiol. 2017 Mar 09;8:318 - PubMed
  7. Phytopathology. 2003 Oct;93(10):1209-16 - PubMed
  8. Front Microbiol. 2014 Oct 31;5:557 - PubMed
  9. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Feb;20(2):341-51 - PubMed
  10. Phys Rev Lett. 2004 Feb 20;92(7):074501 - PubMed
  11. Am J Infect Control. 1998 Aug;26(4):453-64 - PubMed
  12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jan;49(1):1-7 - PubMed
  13. Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1299-1303 - PubMed
  14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 May;43(5):1001-5 - PubMed
  15. Science. 1981 Apr 17;212(4492):324-6 - PubMed
  16. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015 Jun;7(3):460-70 - PubMed
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):5797-803 - PubMed
  18. Science. 1977 Nov 11;198(4317):575-80 - PubMed

Publication Types