Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Oct 08;5:2054358118803323. doi: 10.1177/2054358118803323. eCollection 2018.
Educational Support Around Dialysis Modality Decision Making in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Qualitative Study.
Canadian journal of kidney health and disease
Brendan P Cassidy, Lori Harwood, Leah E Getchell, Michael Smith, Shannon L Sibbald, Louise M Moist
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
- Renal Services, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Kidney Dialysis and Transplantation Research Program, London, ON, Canada.
- Renal Patient and Family Advisory Council, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada.
- Kidney Clinical Research Unit, Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
PMID: 30327720
PMCID: PMC6178119 DOI: 10.1177/2054358118803323
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are asked to choose a renal replacement therapy or conservative management. Education and knowledge transfer play key roles in this decision-making process, yet they remain a partially met need.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand the dialysis modality decision-making process through exploration of the predialysis patient experience to better inform the educational process.
DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study.
SETTING: Kidney Care Centre of London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ontario, Canada.
PATIENTS: Twelve patients with CKD, with 4 patients on in-center hemodialysis, home hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis, respectively.
MEASUREMENTS: Not applicable.
METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with each participant, along with any family members who were present. Interviews were transcribed verbatim. Conventional content analysis was used to analyze the transcripts for common themes. Representative quotes were decided via team consensus. A patient collaborator was part of the research team.
RESULTS: Three themes influenced dialysis modality decision making: (i) Patient Factors: individualization, autonomy, and emotions; (ii) Educational Factors: tailored education, time and preparation, and available resources; and (iii) Support Systems: partnership with health care team, and family and friends.
LIMITATIONS: Sample not representative of wider CKD population. Limited number of eligible patients. Poor recall may affect findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Modality decision making is a complex process, influenced by the patient's health literacy, willingness to accept information, predialysis lifestyle, support systems, and values. Patient education requires the flexibility to individualize the delivery of a standardized CKD curriculum in partnership with a patient-health care team, to fulfill the goal of informed, shared decision making.
Keywords: CKD; dialysis modality; education; health care team; informed decision making
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Apr;27(4):1542-7 - PubMed
- Curr Transplant Rep. 2016 Mar;3(1):1-9 - PubMed
- Transplant Proc. 2001 Sep;33(6):3006-9 - PubMed
- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Jan;28(1):129-37 - PubMed
- J Nephrol Soc Work. 2009 Winter;32:15-26 - PubMed
- Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Jan;50(1):109-20 - PubMed
- Clin Kidney J. 2015 Aug;8(4):462-8 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):24-7 - PubMed
- Perit Dial Int. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):280-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 May 15;95(10):e69 - PubMed
- J Nephrol. 2014 Oct;27(5):571-6 - PubMed
- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Apr;26(4):1266-74 - PubMed
- Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Sep 09;9:1279-91 - PubMed
- Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:799-823 - PubMed
- Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):710-23 - PubMed
- Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405 - PubMed
- J Clin Nurs. 2014 Dec;23(23-24):3378-90 - PubMed
- Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 04;11:47 - PubMed
- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Jul;30(7):1058-66 - PubMed
- Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):518-26 - PubMed
- Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):588-94 - PubMed
- BMJ. 2010 Jan 19;340:c112 - PubMed
- Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 - PubMed
- Kidney Int. 2005 Jul;68(1):378-90 - PubMed
- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Mar;31(3):368-75 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):149-58 - PubMed
- Perit Dial Int. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):358-61 - PubMed
- J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May;18(5):370-6 - PubMed
- World J Nephrol. 2016 Mar 6;5(2):147-51 - PubMed
- BMC Res Notes. 2014 Oct 17;7:730 - PubMed
- Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Nov;99(11):1759-1771 - PubMed
- Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):197-204 - PubMed
- Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jun;65(6):842-50 - PubMed
- Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):694-703 - PubMed
- Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Oct;26(10):3302-8 - PubMed
- Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016 May 12;3:32 - PubMed
- Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Aug;58(2):235-42 - PubMed
- Br J Nurs. 2005 Jun 23-Jul 13;14(12):659-64 - PubMed
- Nephrol Nurs J. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):491-7; quiz 498 - PubMed
- Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Apr 10;8(7):381-9 - PubMed
- Kidney Int. 2008 Nov;74(9):1178-84 - PubMed
- Perit Dial Int. 2002 Mar-Apr;22(2):184-90 - PubMed
- Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 May;20(5):360-7 - PubMed
- J Ren Care. 2015 Mar;41(1):62-75 - PubMed
- ANNA J. 1996 Aug;23(4):369-75; discussion 376-7 - PubMed
- BMC Nephrol. 2014 Oct 14;15:166 - PubMed
Publication Types