Display options
Share it on

J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Jun 30;11(1):1809. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1809. eCollection 2018.

Coronary Sinus Electrograms May Predict New-onset Atrial Fibrillation After Typical Atrial Flutter Radiofrequency Ablation (CSE-AF).

Journal of atrial fibrillation

Usama Boles, Enes Elvin Gul, Andres Enriquez, Neasa Starr, Sohaib Haseeb, Hoshiar Abdollah, Christopher Simpson, Adrian Baranchuk, Damian Redfearn, Kevin Michael, Wilma Hopman, Benedict Glover

Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Service, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  2. Heart and Vascular centre, Cardiology department, Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

PMID: 30455831 PMCID: PMC6207233 DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1809

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complex fractionated electrograms (EGMs) of the coronary sinus electrograms (CSEs) are employed as a target during radiofrequency ablations (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). Anatomically, CSEs includes both of left atrium (LA), coronary sinus musculature and right atrium (RA) electrograms.

AIM: To determine the significance of fractionated CSE and delayed potentials as a predictor of new-onset AF after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of isolated atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS: Consecutive patients underwent AFL ablation. Fractionated and/or continuous discrete activities were recorded from coronary sinus electrograms during sinus rhythm and during pacing. Earliest CSE to the S nadir or peak R in milliseconds was recorded and considered as propagation delay for EGMs.

RESULTS: Forty patients were included during a mean follow-up period of 55.1± 15.8 months. Twenty patients (50 %) developed AF while the remaining 20 patients maintained sinus rhythm(SR) during the follow-up period. Proximal and mid CSEs were significantly fractionated in AF group compared to group with no AF development (65 % and 60% Vs. 35 % and 30 %, p = 0.03, respectively). However, during pacing from distal duo-decapolar catheter (pole 1-2), distal CSEs alone were significantly fractionated (p < 0.05) compared to SR group. Significant delayed propagation of proximal CSE during pacing and in sinus rhythm were observed in AF group (12.3 ± 9.2 ms vs 7.1 ± 3.6 ms, p = 0.03) and (7.2 ± 2.9 ms Vs 8.1 ± 4.6 ms, p= 0.02) in the same order.

CONCLUSION: Incidence of AF is associated with fractionated proximal and mid CSE in sinus rhythm and distal CSE during paced rhythm after isolated AFL ablation. Delayed proximal CSE propagation is correlated with AF incidence.

Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation ; CSEs Represent Left Atrium; Cavo-tricuspid (CTI); Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

References

  1. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jun;20(6):630-6 - PubMed
  2. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 Nov;7(11):800-5 - PubMed
  3. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Sep;7(9):1200-4 - PubMed
  4. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Oct;19(10):1017-23 - PubMed
  5. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Nov;27(11):1507-12 - PubMed
  6. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1536-43 - PubMed
  7. Heart Vessels. 1991;6(4):224-8 - PubMed
  8. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;7(3):225-31 - PubMed
  9. Circulation. 1998 Oct 27;98(17):1790-5 - PubMed
  10. Heart Rhythm. 2008 Jun;5(6):855-6 - PubMed
  11. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Aug;4(8):1029-33 - PubMed
  12. Circulation. 1999 Dec 21-28;100(25):2507-13 - PubMed
  13. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 May;37(6):1651-7 - PubMed
  14. Circulation. 2000 Feb 15;101(6):647-52 - PubMed
  15. Circ Res. 1986 Mar;58(3):356-71 - PubMed
  16. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1284-91 - PubMed
  17. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;5(1):32-42 - PubMed
  18. Circulation. 1995 Aug 1;92(3):430-5 - PubMed
  19. J Electrocardiol. 2011 Mar-Apr;44(2):157-63 - PubMed
  20. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Nov;10(11):1598-604 - PubMed
  21. Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):384-9 - PubMed
  22. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1898-904 - PubMed

Publication Types