Display options
Share it on

IISE Trans Healthc Syst Eng. 2018;8(1):72-82. doi: 10.1080/24725579.2017.1418769. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

Quantifying the Qualitative with Epistemic Network Analysis: A Human Factors Case Study of Task-Allocation Communication in a Primary Care Team.

IISE transactions on healthcare systems engineering

Abigail R Wooldridge, Pascale Carayon, David Williamson Shaffer, Brendan Eagan

Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

PMID: 30370395 PMCID: PMC6201247 DOI: 10.1080/24725579.2017.1418769

Abstract

Health care is fundamentally about people, and therefore, engineering approaches for studying healthcare systems must consider the perspective, concepts and methods offered by the human factors and ergonomics (HFE) discipline. HFE analysis is often qualitative to provide in-depth description of work systems and processes. To deepen our understanding of care processes, we propose the next level of analysis, i.e. quantification of qualitative data. Here, we describe epistemic network analysis (ENA) as a novel method to quantify qualitative data and present a case study applying ENA to assess communication in a primary care team. One high-performing primary care team consisting of a physician, nurse, medical assistant and unit clerk was observed for 15 hours. We analyzed task-allocation communications and identified the sender, receiver, synchronicity and acceptance. We used logistic regression and ENA to evaluate sender, receiver and synchronicity impact on task acceptance. The physician and unit clerk were most successful allocating tasks. Future work should consider the role of synchronous, interruptive communication as potentially useful in time-critical tasks and further investigate the role of the unit clerk. HFE researchers should consider ENA as a tool to expand and deepen their understanding of care processes by quantifying qualitative data.

Keywords: communication; human factors; mixed methods research; network analysis; primary care; qualitative research; teams

References

  1. Am J Surg. 2017 Dec 2;:null - PubMed
  2. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967 Jun;16(6):699-703 - PubMed
  3. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Jan;33(1):34-47 - PubMed
  4. Inform Health Soc Care. 2008 Jun;33(2):139-49 - PubMed
  5. Fam Syst Health. 2015 Sep;33(3):182-92 - PubMed
  6. Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88 - PubMed
  7. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 13;12:63 - PubMed
  8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Apr;21(4):347-51 - PubMed
  9. BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12 - PubMed
  10. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):426-34 - PubMed
  11. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 1:i50-8 - PubMed
  12. Appl Ergon. 2015 Nov;51:291-321 - PubMed
  13. BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):673-6 - PubMed
  14. Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):540-7 - PubMed
  15. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):453-61 - PubMed
  16. Appl Ergon. 2014 May;45(3):747-56 - PubMed
  17. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Sep;35(9):457-66 - PubMed
  18. Int J Nurs Stud. 2001 Apr;38(2):129-40 - PubMed
  19. Ann Fam Med. 2015 Mar;13(2):139-48 - PubMed
  20. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Apr;23(2):187-97 - PubMed
  21. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i57-64 - PubMed
  22. Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:1016 - PubMed
  23. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Feb;75(2):163-72 - PubMed
  24. Appl Ergon. 2015 Nov;51:244-54 - PubMed
  25. Fam Syst Health. 2010 Dec;28(4):334-47 - PubMed
  26. J Interprof Care. 2015 Jan;29(1):26-33 - PubMed
  27. Appl Ergon. 2014 Jan;45(1):5-13 - PubMed
  28. BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2 - PubMed
  29. J Biomech Eng. 2015 Feb 1;137(2):024701 - PubMed
  30. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jun;79(6):e109-15 - PubMed
  31. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jun;58:1-11 - PubMed
  32. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2417-22 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support