Display options
Share it on

Pulm Circ. 2019 Jan-Mar;9(1):2045894018816968. doi: 10.1177/2045894018816968. Epub 2018 Nov 15.

Value of lung perfusion scintigraphy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a patchy pattern to consider.

Pulmonary circulation

Meng Wang, Rongzheng Ma, Dayong Wu, Changming Xiong, Jianguo He, Lei Wang, Xiaoxin Sun, Wei Fang

Affiliations

  1. 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  2. 2 Center for Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Vascular Diseases, Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

PMID: 30430895 PMCID: PMC6295704 DOI: 10.1177/2045894018816968

Abstract

The ventilation/perfusion lung scan is recommended to exclude chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in the diagnostic algorithm of pulmonary hypertension, but its role in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has not been well explored. We characterized the lung perfusion pattern assessed by lung perfusion scintigraphy in idiopathic PAH (IPAH) patients and evaluate the potential prognostic significance of the patchy pattern perfusion defect. A total of 318 patients with IPAH confirmed by right heart catheterization who performed lung perfusion scintigraphy were included. On lung perfusion scintigraphy, 134 patients had normal lung perfusion and 184 patients showed patchy perfusion defects. In comparison to patients with normal lung perfusion, patients with patchy perfusion defects experienced significantly higher mean pulmonary arterial pressure (58.0 ± 15.4 mmHg vs. 54.1 ± 16.2 mmHg, P = 0.027) and total pulmonary resistance (1192.6 ± 533.7 dyn·s·cm

Keywords: idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; lung blood flow; lung perfusion scintigraphy; prognosis

References

  1. J Nucl Med. 2002 Jun;43(6):757-61 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 9;327(2):76-81 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Aug;36(8):1356-70 - PubMed
  4. Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):156-63 - PubMed
  5. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011 Jun 21;8(8):443-55 - PubMed
  6. Nucl Med Commun. 2012 May;33(5):459-63 - PubMed
  7. Circulation. 1990 Sep;82(3):841-7 - PubMed
  8. Circulation. 2014 Jan 7;129(1):57-65 - PubMed
  9. Korean J Radiol. 2014 Mar-Apr;15(2):286-94 - PubMed
  10. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k - PubMed
  11. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):67-119 - PubMed
  12. Circulation. 2015 Dec 22;132(25):2360-2 - PubMed
  13. Circulation. 2015 Dec 22;132(25):2403-11 - PubMed
  14. Eur Radiol. 2017 Apr;27(4):1631-1639 - PubMed
  15. Circulation. 1989 Nov;80(5):1198-206 - PubMed
  16. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Oct;105(4):499-502 - PubMed
  17. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Jan;144(1):27-30 - PubMed
  18. Circulation. 1984 Oct;70(4):580-7 - PubMed
  19. Chest. 1983 Dec;84(6):679-83 - PubMed
  20. Br J Radiol. 1993 Aug;66(788):677-80 - PubMed

Publication Types