Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 04;9:2435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02435. eCollection 2018.

Gender Stereotypes in a Children's Television Program: Effects on Girls' and Boys' Stereotype Endorsement, Math Performance, Motivational Dispositions, and Attitudes.

Frontiers in psychology

Eike Wille, Hanna Gaspard, Ulrich Trautwein, Kerstin Oschatz, Katharina Scheiter, Benjamin Nagengast

Affiliations

  1. Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  2. Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
  3. University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

PMID: 30564179 PMCID: PMC6288401 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02435

Abstract

Television programs are a central part of children's everyday lives. These programs often transmit stereotypes about gender roles such as "math is for boys and not for girls." So far, however, it is unclear whether stereotypes that are embedded in television programs affect girls' and boys' performance, motivational dispositions, or attitudes. On the basis of research on expectancy-value theory and stereotype threat, we conducted a randomized study with a total of 335 fifth-grade students to address this question. As the experimental material, we used a television program that had originally been produced for a national TV channel. The program was designed to show children that math could be interesting and fun. In the experimental condition, the program included a gender stereotyped segment in which two girls who were frustrated with math copied their math homework from a male classmate. In the control condition, participants watched an equally long, neutral summary of the first part of the video. We investigated effects on boys' and girls' stereotype endorsement, math performance, and different motivational constructs to gain insights into differential effects. On the basis of prior research, we expected negative effects of watching the stereotypes on girls' performance, motivational dispositions, and attitudes. Effects on the same outcomes for boys as well as children's stereotype endorsement were explored as open questions. We pre-registered our research predictions and analyses before conducting the experiment. Our results provide partial support for short-term effects of gender stereotypes embedded in television programs: Watching the stereotypes embedded in the video increased boys' and girls' stereotype endorsement. Boys reported a higher sense of belonging but lower utility value after watching the video with the stereotypes. Boys' other outcome variables were not affected, and there were also no effects on girl's performance, motivational dispositions, or attitudes. Results offer initial insights into how even short segments involving gender stereotypes in television shows can influence girls' and boys' stereotype endorsement and how such stereotypes may constitute one factor that contributes to gender differences in the STEM fields.

Keywords: gender differences; math motivation; math performance; stereotypes; television

References

  1. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):68-81 - PubMed
  2. Psychol Sci. 2001 Sep;12(5):385-90 - PubMed
  3. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:109-32 - PubMed
  4. Psychol Rev. 2002 Jan;109(1):3-25 - PubMed
  5. Child Dev. 2005 Mar-Apr;76(2):397-416 - PubMed
  6. Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Dec;76(Pt 4):761-80 - PubMed
  7. Child Dev. 2007 Mar-Apr;78(2):430-47 - PubMed
  8. Dev Psychol. 2007 May;43(3):747-59 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Sci. 2007 Oct;18(10):879-85 - PubMed
  10. Science. 2008 May 9;320(5877):740-1 - PubMed
  11. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1314-34 - PubMed
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1045-60 - PubMed
  13. Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;136(1):103-127 - PubMed
  14. J Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar-Apr;150(2):132-47 - PubMed
  15. Dev Psychol. 2011 Jul;47(4):943-9 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Sci. 2011 Aug;22(8):1058-66 - PubMed
  17. Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;120(3):544-60 - PubMed
  18. Educ Psychol Rev. 2013 Jun 1;25(2):211-243 - PubMed
  19. Dev Rev. 2013 Dec 1;33(4):null - PubMed
  20. Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1174-204 - PubMed
  21. J Sch Psychol. 2015 Feb;53(1):25-44 - PubMed
  22. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8 - PubMed
  23. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:415-37 - PubMed
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Nov;69(5):797-811 - PubMed

Publication Types