J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Jan-Feb;10(1):182-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
The diaphyseal aseptic tibial nonunions after failed previous treatment options managed with the reamed intramedullary locking nail.
Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
Igor Kostic, Milan Mitkovic, Milorad Mitkovic
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Nis, Bul. Dr Z. Djindjic 48, 18000 Nis, Serbia.
- National Academy of Medical Science, Medical Faculty, University of Nis, Serbia, Bul. Dr Z. Djindjic 81, 18000 Nis, Serbia.
PMID: 30705557
PMCID: PMC6349606 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.006
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nonunion of open and closed tibial shaft fractures continues to be a common complication of fractures. Tibial nonunions constitute the majority of long bone nonunions seen by orthopaedic surgeons. In this article, we present our approach to the surgical treatment of noninfected tibial shaft nonunions.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2014, 33 patients with aseptic diaphyseal tibial nonunion was treated by reamed intramedullary nailing and were retrospectively reviewed. The initial fracture management consisted of external fixation (27 patients), plate fixation (2 patients) and cast treatment (4 patients). All patients, preoperatively, were evaluated for the signs of the infection, by the same protocol. There were 13 hypertrophic, 16 oligotrophic (atrophic) and 4 defect nonunions registered in our material. The primary goal was to perform a closed intramedullary nailing on antegrade manner. An open procedure was only unavoidable when implants had to be removed or an osteotomy had to be performed to improve the alignment. Functional rehabilitation was encouraged with the assistance of a physiotherapist early postoperative. Patients were examined regularly during followed-up for a minimum of 12 months period for clinical and radiological signs of union, infection, malunion, malalignment, limb shortening, and implant failure.
RESULTS: The time that elapsed from injury to intramedullary nailing ranged from 9 months to 48 months (mean 17 months).Open intramedullary nailing was unavoidable in 25 cases (75,75%), while closed nailing was performed in 8 patients (24,25%). Osteotomy or resection of the fibula was performed in 78,8% of the cases. All patients were followed up in average period of 2 years postoperative (range 1-4 years), and 31(93,9%) patients achieved a solid union within the first 8 months. Mean union time was 5±0.8 months. Complications included 2 (6,06%) patients, one with deep infection and another case with absence of bone healing. Anatomical alignment has been achieved in the majority of patients, 28 patients (84,8%). The additionally autogenous bone chips were added in 4 patients (12,1%) where cortical defect was greater than 50% of the bone circumference.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, a reamed intramedullary nail provides optimal conditions for stable fixation, good rotational control, adequate alignment, early weight-bearing and a high union rate of tibial non-unions. Reaming of the medullary canal with preservation of periosteal sleeve create the "breeding ground" for sound healing of tibial shaft nonunions. Additionally cancellous bone grafting is recommended only in the case of defect nonunion.
Keywords: Bone grafting; Reamed IM nail; Tibial shaft non-union
References
- Injury. 2001 Apr;32(3):233-9 - PubMed
- Int Orthop. 2003;27(1):26-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Oct;74(9):1279-85 - PubMed
- J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Feb;18(2):96-101 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Feb;(419):4-12 - PubMed
- J Trauma. 2004 Nov;57(5):1053-9 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 May;(278):200-6 - PubMed
- Bone. 2005 Jan;36(1):74-83 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Feb;(431):50-6 - PubMed
- J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Nov-Dec;19(10 Suppl):S11-3 - PubMed
- Chang Gung Med J. 2006 May-Jun;29(3):283-90 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):177-88 - PubMed
- Injury. 2008 Sep;39 Suppl 2:S83-90 - PubMed
- Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2009 Oct;4(2):89-94 - PubMed
- Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jul;131(7):885-91 - PubMed
- Instr Course Lect. 1990;39:471-82 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Sep;19(9):563-73 - PubMed
- J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Oct;27(10):582-6 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Oct;471(10):3196-203 - PubMed
- Injury. 2012 Dec;43 Suppl 2:S63-7 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Feb;72(2):299-304 - PubMed
- J Intern Med. 2014 Aug;276(2):111-9 - PubMed
- Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):814-7 - PubMed
- Bone Joint Res. 2016 Apr;5(4):116-21 - PubMed
- Injury. 2016 Jul;47(7):1506-13 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Jul;70(6):900-11 - PubMed
- Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Jan;36(1):70-5 - PubMed
- Clin Chim Acta. 1996 Nov 15;255(1):27-38 - PubMed
- J Orthop Trauma. 1999 Jan;13(1):33-8 - PubMed
Publication Types