Display options
Cite
Kumar M. Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:99doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099.
Kumar, M. (2019). Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda. Frontiers in psychiatry, 1099. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099
Kumar, Manasi. "Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda." Frontiers in psychiatry vol. 10 (2019): 99. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099
Kumar M. Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 13;10:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099. eCollection 2019. PMID: 30936839; PMCID: PMC6432896.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 13;10:99. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099. eCollection 2019.

Championing Equity, Empowerment, and Transformational Leadership in (Mental Health) Research Partnerships: Aligning Collaborative Work With the Global Development Agenda.

Frontiers in psychiatry

Manasi Kumar

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
  2. Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

PMID: 30936839 PMCID: PMC6432896 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00099

Abstract

Through a narrative synthesis of existing literature on research partnerships, the paper underscores four core values championed in public policy and practice: equity, empowerment, transformational leadership, and treating mental health research as a cooperative inquiry. Building on these values, the author maps the challenges before mental health researchers in forging resilient, egalitarian, and committed Global North-South partnerships within the context of current global development agenda. Reports appraising the UN Millennium Development Goals lament how the goal of developing global partnerships to combat health, gender, and economic inequities has remained under-realized. Emphasis has been placed on the great need to augment Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in ways where partnership processes would drive development and human rights agenda for the most afflicted, under-resourced, and marginalized in the world. Global North-South partnerships result in fewer lasting benefits to Global South-a regressive trend that is critically analyzed. The need for Global North to adopt ethical and responsible stances while creating/curating new knowledge is discussed. Being responsible is not only imperative for Global North researchers; it is imperative for both North and South researchers to adopt a dialogical approach in clarifying and sharing roles, responsibilities, access, and leadership in developing scholarship and praxis in mental health. The importance of de-centering hierarchies, valuing reciprocity in one another, improving communication, demonstrating empathy, and sharing resources and benefits are found to be key components in the narrative synthesis towards achieving greater empowerment and equity. The paper reflects on the potential problems in engagement and development of de-centered and transformational leadership in partnerships and implications for research ethics in the context of lower-and-middle-income countries. Lastly, the author in a bid to encourage global partnerships suggests that engaging in transparent and bi-directional conversations regarding these issues and realigning research priorities along the four core values will contribute to greater success in research collaborations (across cultural contexts) and more so in the global mental health field.

Keywords: development; empowerment; equity; global South; global mental health; global north

References

  1. Health Care Anal. 2008 Mar;16(1):39-51 - PubMed
  2. Dev World Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(2):82-92 - PubMed
  3. BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Oct 03;12:20 - PubMed
  4. BMC Med Ethics. 2011 Nov 15;12:22 - PubMed
  5. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Sep;21(3):241-4 - PubMed
  6. Global Health. 2012 Aug 16;8:29 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223 - PubMed
  8. Glob Health Action. 2013 Sep 30;6:21328 - PubMed
  9. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Oct;8(4):1-18 - PubMed
  10. Transcult Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;51(6):790-805 - PubMed
  11. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(9):1008-22 - PubMed
  12. Med Anthropol Q. 2015 Dec;29(4):492-511 - PubMed
  13. Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):243-52 - PubMed
  14. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2015 Mar;25(1):35-66 - PubMed
  15. BMC Med. 2015 Apr 10;13:79 - PubMed
  16. PLoS Med. 2015 Sep 08;12(9):e1001872 - PubMed
  17. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Jan;94(1):5-7 - PubMed
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;146:236-42 - PubMed
  19. Colomb Med (Cali). 2015 Sep 30;46(3):128-34 - PubMed
  20. Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Nov 26;22:306 - PubMed
  21. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Aug 18;14(1):64 - PubMed
  22. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Sep 02;14(1):67 - PubMed
  23. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):601 - PubMed
  24. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Dec 12;15(1):204 - PubMed
  25. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Jul 18;5(12):675-682 - PubMed
  26. Global Health. 2017 Apr 18;13(1):25 - PubMed
  27. Glob Chall. 2017 Jan;1(1):47-60 - PubMed
  28. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jul;32(7):537-546 - PubMed
  29. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1312-1318 - PubMed
  30. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 18;18(1):138 - PubMed
  31. Prev Sci. 2018 Jul 30;: - PubMed
  32. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Apr;44(8):1229-38 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support