Display options
Share it on

J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 May;20(2):155-160. doi: 10.1177/1751143718801705. Epub 2018 Oct 02.

Incidence of general surgical procedures in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Journal of the Intensive Care Society

Biren K Juthani, Jennifer Macfarlan, James Wu, Scott Beman, Timothy S Misselbeck

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT, USA.
  2. Lehigh Valley Health Network, Network Office of Research and Innovation, Allentown, PA, USA.
  3. Lehigh Valley Physician Group, Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Allentown, PA, USA.
  4. Lehigh Valley Physician Group, LVPG General and Bariatric Surgery, Allentown, PA, USA.

PMID: 31037108 PMCID: PMC6475990 DOI: 10.1177/1751143718801705

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use may predispose patients to developing conditions that require either consultation with a general surgeon or a general surgical procedure. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients who underwent general surgical procedure.

METHODS: This was a single institution retrospective study of adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients from 2012 to 2015. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent general surgical procedure with those that did not.

RESULTS: Of the 115 patients, 54 (46.9%) required a general surgeon while 42 (36.5%) required a general surgical procedure. No significant differences were observed in mortality (35.7% vs. 46.6%; p = 0.256) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related complications (45.7% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.175). Patients with general surgical procedure had longer extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration (13 vs. 5 days; p < 0.0001), longer length of stay (36 vs. 15 days; p = 0.0005), more wound infections (19.05% vs. 5.5%; p = 0.029), more urinary tract infections (38.1% vs. 10.96%; p = 0.0006), and more pulmonary emboli (19.05% vs. 5.48%; p = 0.029). In general surgical procedure patients, no difference in bleeding complications was observed regardless of anti-coagulation status (29.4% vs. 16%; p = 0.44).

CONCLUSION: Common general surgical procedures are safe and feasible in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was longer for patients requiring general surgical procedure. Despite the common use of anticoagulants, there was no increase in bleeding events in general surgical procedure patients.

Keywords: Critical care; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; multidisciplinary; surgery

References

  1. JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8 - PubMed
  2. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):295-300 - PubMed
  3. J Perinatol. 1992 Mar;12(1):18-20 - PubMed
  4. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 Mar;8(2):177-9 - PubMed
  5. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1991 Oct;13(3):285-9 - PubMed
  6. ASAIO J. 2008 Jul-Aug;54(4):436-8 - PubMed
  7. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Sep;36(5):726-31 - PubMed
  8. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):e40-1 - PubMed
  9. Am Surg. 2011 Oct;77(10):1314-7 - PubMed
  10. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Aug;44(8):705 - PubMed
  11. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1792-9 - PubMed
  12. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):1989-94 - PubMed
  13. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep 1;190(5):497-508 - PubMed
  14. ASAIO J. 2015 Sep-Oct;61(5):556-63 - PubMed
  15. ASAIO J. 2015 Sep-Oct;61(5):520-5 - PubMed
  16. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Nov;81(11):1170-83, 77 p following 1183 - PubMed

Publication Types